An Introduction to the Elder-Led Model of Church Government

An Introduction to the Elder-Led Model of Church Government

Contents

I. Introduction

A. Explanation of Elder-Led form of church government

B. Importance of understanding Elder-Led form of church government

II. Biblical Foundation of Elder-Led church government

A. Key passages supporting the Elder-Led model

B. Comparison with other models of church government

III. Qualifications of Elders

IV. Responsibilities of Elders

A. Spiritual Leadership

B. Overseeing Church Operations

C. Accountability to the congregation

V. Congregational Involvement in Elder-Led church government

A. Congregational Involvement

B. Role of the congregation in selecting Elders

C. Multiplicity of Elders

D. Potential challenges in selecting Elders

E. Potential challenges in balancing Elder authority and congregational participation

VI. Challenges and potential pitfalls of Elder-Led church government

VII. Conclusion

A. Recap of key points

B. Importance of implementing an effective Elder-Led church government

An Introduction to the Elder-Led Model of Church Government

Written, Edited, Compiled by Nathan Lee Lewis

I. Introduction

A. Explanation of Elder-Led form of church government

The Elder-Led form of church government is a model of church leadership where a multiple of mature and qualified individuals, known as Elders, provide spiritual leadership and oversight to the congregation. This group of Elders is responsible for making key decisions related to the church's direction, doctrine, and administration. The role of the congregation is to support the Elders, pray for them, and follow their leadership. This model is based on the belief that God has given the responsibility of leading and shepherding the church to a multiplicity of qualified and experienced individuals, rather than a single leader or a board of directors.

B. Importance of understanding Elder-Led form of church government

Understanding the Elder-Led form of church government is important for several reasons.

1. It is a biblical model of church government, as seen in the New Testament. Therefore, it is important to understand this model in order to adhere to biblical principles and to ensure that the church is being led in accordance with God's design.

2. The Elder-Led form of church government is a unique model of leadership that differs from other forms of church government, such as congregational-led or hierarchical models. Understanding this model can help individuals better appreciate the love that Christ has for his Church and the safeguards he has put in place for the health of his body.

3. Understanding the Elder-Led form of church government can help individuals better understand their role in the church community. By understanding the responsibilities of Elders and the role of the congregation, individuals can more effectively participate in the decision-making process and support the leadership of the church.

4. Understanding the Elder-Led form of church government can help promote unity and accountability within the church community. When everyone understands and respects the roles and responsibilities of Elders and the congregation, it can help prevent conflicts and promote a healthy, thriving community of faith. “Let all things be done decently and in an orderly way.” (1 Cor 14:40)

II. Biblical Foundation of Elder-Led church government

The biblical foundation of Elder-Led church government is primarily based on the teaching and examples found in the New Testament. Here are some key passages that support this model:

A. Key passages supporting the Elder-Led model:

1. 1 Timothy 5:17-20 – “Let the elders who lead well be counted worthy of double honor, especially those who work hard in proclaiming the word and in teaching. For the Scripture says, Do not muzzle the ox while it treads out the grain. And, The worker is worthy of his wages. Do not accept an accusation against an elder except on the basis of two or three witnesses. Those who persist in sin, reprove in front of everyone, so that the rest will also be afraid of the consequences.”

This passage outlines the role of Elders in the church and emphasizes their responsibility to lead, teach, and oversee the congregation. It also highlights the importance of honoring and respecting the Elders who serve faithfully.

2. Titus 1:5-9 – “For this reason I left you in Crete, so that you would set in order the things that were lacking and appoint elders in every city as I directed you—if anyone is blameless, the husband of one wife, having children who believe and who are not accused of reckless actions or rebelliousness. For the overseer, as a manager of God’s household, must be blameless, not arrogant, not quick-tempered, not an excessive drinker, not violent, not eager for dishonorable gain, but given to hospitality, loving what is good, sensible, righteous, pure, self-controlled, holding firmly to the faithful word as he has been taught, so that he will be able both to encourage others by his sound doctrine and to refute those who oppose it.”

This passage outlines the qualifications of Elders and emphasizes the importance of their role in the church. It states that Elders should be "blameless, faithful to their spouse, have children who are believers, not given to drunkenness, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, and not pursuing dishonest gain."

3. Acts 14:23 – “And when they had appointed elders for them in every church, and had prayed with fasting, they committed them to the Lord, on whom they had believed.”

This passage describes how the apostles appointed Elders in every church. It suggests that the practice of appointing Elders was common in the early church.

4. Acts 20:17-38– “And from Miletus he sent to Ephesus, and called to him the elders of the church…Pay attention to yourselves, and to all the flock over which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God that he purchased with the blood of his own Son...I know that after my departure grievous wolves will enter in among you, not sparing the flock, and from among your own selves men will arise, speaking twisted things to draw away the disciples after them…”

This passage recounts Paul's farewell address to the Elders of the church in Ephesus. It emphasizes the vital role of Elders as shepherds of the flock and highlights their responsibility to protect the church from false teaching and to lead with humility.

5. 1 Peter 5:1-4 – “Now, I exhort the elders among you, as a fellow elder and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and a partaker of the glory that is about to be revealed: Shepherd the flock of God that is among you, watching over them, not out of compulsion but willingly, according to the will of God, and not being greedy for profit but eager to serve, and not abusing your authority over those in your care, but being an example to the flock. And when the Chief Shepherd appears, you will receive the crown of glory that will never fade away.”

This passage emphasizes the importance of Elders as spiritual leaders who are accountable to God for their actions.

Overall, the New Testament presents a clear picture of Elders as mature and qualified individuals who are responsible for providing spiritual leadership and guidance to the church community. This model emphasizes the importance of accountability, humility, and a deep commitment to God and His Word.

B. Comparison with other models of church government

There are several models of church government, including Elder-Led, oligarchic, congregational, episcopal, and hierarchical. Here is a brief comparison of the Elder-Led model with other models:

1. Elder-Led: In the Elder-Led model, the church is led by a group of mature and qualified individuals known as Elders. These Elders are responsible for providing spiritual leadership, teaching, and oversight to the congregation. The congregation supports and submits to the leadership of the Elders.

2. Oligarchy: In the Oligarchy model, a board controls all decisions, such as an elite group of prominent members or trustees who have the only word in the decision-making process. An oligarchy may also inadvertently evolve in churches that have an Elder-Led model of church government, but the congregation and individual members are rarely, if ever, included in leadership roles or consulted during the decision-making process.

3. Congregational: In the congregational model, the entire congregation leads the church. Key decisions, such as the selection of Elders/Pastors and church leaders, are made by the members through voting or consensus. This is also known as the democratic model.

4. Episcopal: In the Episcopal model, the church is led by a hierarchy of bishops or board of trustees who oversee multiple congregations. The bishops are responsible for appointing pastors and church leaders, and for providing spiritual oversight to the congregations.

5. Hierarchical: In the hierarchical model, the church is led by a centralized authority, such as the Pope in the Roman Catholic Church or a single authoritative pastor. Key decisions are made by the central authority, and leaders are appointed by the authority.

Compared to other models, the Elder-Led model emphasizes the importance of qualified and spiritually mature leaders who provide guidance, accountability, and spiritual care to the congregation. It is distinguished by its reliance on a group of Elders rather than a single leader or a democratic voting process. The Elder-Led model values the importance of community, accountability, and sound biblical teaching, and often emphasizes discipleship and pastoral care.

III. Qualifications of Elders

Biblical requirements for Elders:

The biblical requirements for Elders are found primarily in two New Testament passages: 1 Timothy 3:1-7 and Titus 1:5-9. Here is a summary of the requirements:

1. Blameless: An Elder must be above reproach, with a good reputation inside and outside the church.

2. Husband of one wife: Elders should be faithful to their spouse and committed to their marriage.

3. Temperate: Elders should exercise self-control in all areas of life, avoiding excess or addiction.

4. Sober-minded: Elders should have a clear and disciplined mind, able to think critically and make wise decisions.

5. Respectable: Elders should be respected in the community, demonstrating a character of integrity and moral purity.

6. Hospitable: Elders should be welcoming and generous, providing a safe and caring environment for others.

7. Able to teach: Elders should have a deep knowledge of Scripture and be able to teach and explain it to others.

8. Not given to drunkenness: Elders should not be addicted to alcohol or other substances that impair their judgment.

9. Gentle: Elders should be patient, kind, and gentle in their interactions with others.

10. Not quarrelsome: Elders should not be argumentative or quick-tempered but should be able to resolve conflicts in a peaceful and constructive manner.

11. Manage their household well: Elders should be able to lead and care for their own families, demonstrating the qualities of leadership and responsibility.

12. Not a recent convert: Elders should be spiritually mature, having demonstrated a pattern of faithful service and growth in their faith over time.

Overall, the biblical requirements for Elders emphasize the importance of character, spiritual maturity, and the ability to teach and lead others in a way that reflects the values of the Gospel. These requirements help to ensure that Elders are qualified to provide spiritual leadership, guidance, and oversight to the congregation.

IV. Responsibilities of Elders

The responsibilities of Elders in an Elder-Led form of church government can vary depending on the specific congregation, but include the following:

A. Spiritual Leadership

The spiritual leadership of the church is an important responsibility of the Elders in an Elder-Led form of church government. This involves providing guidance, support, and direction to the congregation in matters of faith and practice.

Some of the ways in which Elders provide spiritual leadership include:

1. Vision and mission: Elders are responsible for developing and articulating the vision and mission of the church, based on their understanding of Scripture and their knowledge of the needs of the congregation and the community.

2. Teaching and preaching: Elders may be called upon to teach and preach, using their knowledge of Scripture to help others grow in their faith and understanding.

3. Prayer: Elders are responsible for leading the congregation in prayer, and for praying for the needs of the church and its members.

4. Pastoral care: Elders are responsible for providing pastoral care to members of the congregation, visiting the sick and homebound, and providing counseling and support when needed.

5. Discipleship: Elders are responsible for promoting discipleship and helping to develop a culture of growth and learning within the church.

6. Discipline: Elders are responsible for maintaining discipline within the congregation, including addressing issues of sin or conflict and helping to restore relationships when necessary.

7. Evangelism: Elders are responsible for promoting evangelism and outreach, helping to share the Gospel with those outside the church and helping to bring new members into the congregation.

Overall, the responsibilities of Elders in an Elder-Led form of church government are focused on providing spiritual leadership, guidance, and care to the congregation. Elders are called upon to use their spiritual gifts and knowledge of Scripture to help others grow in their faith, to provide oversight and care for the affairs of the church, and to promote discipleship, evangelism, and outreach.

B. Overseeing Church Operations

Another responsibility of Elders in an Elder-Led form of church government is overseeing church operations. This involves ensuring that the practical aspects of church life are running smoothly and in accordance with Biblical principles.

Some of the ways in which Elders oversee church operations include:

1. Finances: Elders are responsible for overseeing the financial operations of the church, ensuring that funds are being used in accordance with Biblical principles and that proper accounting procedures are being followed.

2. Facilities: Elders are responsible for overseeing the facilities of the church, ensuring that they are being maintained and used in a manner that is consistent with the mission and vision of the church.

3. Staff: Elders are responsible for selecting and overseeing the leadership of the church, including pastors, staff, and volunteer leaders, ensuring that they are fulfilling their responsibilities and working together in a manner that is consistent with the mission and vision of the church.

4. Programs: Elders are responsible for overseeing the programs of the church, ensuring that they are in alignment with the mission and vision of the church and that they are meeting the needs of the congregation.

5. Policies and procedures: Elders are responsible for developing and implementing policies and procedures that are consistent with Biblical principles and that help to ensure that the operations of the church are running smoothly.

Overall, overseeing church operations is an important responsibility of the Elders in an Elder-Led form of church government. Elders are called upon to ensure that the practical aspects of church life are functioning in a manner that is consistent with Biblical principles, enabling the congregation to conduct its mission and vision effectively. Depending on the size and need of the local church, some of these practical aspects of church life may be delegated to Deacons.

C. Accountability to the congregation

While Elders have significant decision-making authority in an Elder-Led form of church government, it is important to note that they should strive to have a heart of humble accountability toward the congregation. Elders are called upon to use their spiritual gifts and knowledge of Scripture to provide guidance and direction to the congregation, but they are not meant to be authoritarian rulers who act without regard for the input or concerns of the members.

Some ways in which Elders can be accountable to the congregation include:

1. Regular meetings: Elders should meet regularly with members of the congregation to hear their concerns and feedback, and to provide updates on the decisions they are making.

2. Transparency: Elders should be transparent about their decision-making process, sharing their reasoning and any relevant information with the congregation.

3. Openness to feedback: Elders should be open to feedback from the congregation and should be willing to reconsider their decisions considering new information or concerns that are raised.

4. Involvement in the life of the church: Elders should be involved in the life of the church, participating in events and programs, and getting to know members of the congregation on a personal level.

5. Listening to the Holy Spirit: Elders should be sensitive to the leading of the Holy Spirit in their decision-making and should be willing to change course if they sense that God is leading them in a different direction.

Overall, while Elders have significant decision-making authority in an Elder-Led form of church government, they are called upon to use this authority in a manner that is consistent with Biblical principles and that takes into account the needs and concerns of the congregation. Elders should be accountable to the congregation and should seek to provide wise and thoughtful leadership that enables the church to fulfill its mission and vision.

V. Congregational Involvement in Elder-Led Church Government

In an Elder-Led form of church government, congregational involvement is still an important aspect of church life. Although the Elders have significant decision-making authority, they are not meant to dictate all aspects of church life. Instead, the congregation should be involved in various aspects of the church's operations, while the Elders provide spiritual leadership and guidance.

A. Congregational involvement

1. Qualified Deacons (1Tim.3:8-12) may be selected by the congregation and appointed to accomplish the practical aspects of church life and coordinate the various ministries. “And the twelve called the multitude of disciples to them, and said, ‘It is not appropriate that we should neglect the word of God to serve tables. Therefore, brothers, pick out from among you seven men of good reputation, full of the spirit and wisdom whom we can appoint over this task.’” Acts 6:2-3

2. Committee involvement: Members of the congregation can be invited to serve on committees that oversee various aspects of church life, such as worship, outreach, or discipleship. These committees can provide feedback and recommendations to the Elders as they make decisions related to these areas.

3. Input on important decisions: The Elders can seek input from the congregation on important decisions, such as the selecting of a new Elder, hiring a new staff member, or the launch of a new program. This can be done through surveys, town hall meetings, or other forms of communication.

4. Volunteer opportunities: Members of the congregation can be invited to volunteer in various capacities, such as serving as ushers, greeters, or Sunday School teachers, program directors. This not only provides a way for members to get involved, but also helps to develop and utilize their spiritual gifts.

5. Prayer and spiritual support: Members of the congregation can provide prayer and spiritual support to the Elders as they make decisions and provide leadership. This can help to ensure that the decisions being made are in line with God's will.

6. Admonition to the Congregation: "Let the elders who rule well be considered worthy of double honor, especially those who labor in preaching and teaching… Do not entertain an accusation against an elder unless it is brought by two or three witnesses. Those who persist in sin, rebuke in the presence of all, so that the rest may stand in fear." “These six things the Lord hates. Yes, seven are an abomination to Him: A proud look, A lying tongue, Hands that shed innocent blood, A heart that devises wicked plans, Feet that are swift in running to evil, A false witness who speaks lies, and one who sows discord among the brethren.”

Overall, while the Elders have significant decision-making authority in an Elder-Led form of church government, it is important to ensure that the congregation remains involved and engaged in the life of the church. By providing opportunities for congregational involvement and input, and by seeking to work in partnership with the congregation, the Elders can provide spiritual leadership that is wise, thoughtful, and responsive to the needs of the congregation. It is particularly important that the congregation pray for the Elders as their burden is often heavy.

B. Role of the congregation in selecting Elders

In an Elder-Led form of church government, the congregation typically has a role in selecting Elders. This is based on the Biblical principle that church leaders should be chosen from within the congregation, and that the congregation is included in that process.

The exact process for selecting Elders can vary depending on the specific church and its traditions, but some common practices include:

1. Nomination: Members of the congregation are invited by the Elders to nominate individuals who they believe would make good Elders. This can be done through a formal process, such as submitting nominations in writing, or through informal discussions with the current Elders or other members of the congregation.

2. Evaluation: The current Elders or a designated committee then evaluate the nominees based on the Biblical qualifications for Elders, as well as their spiritual gifts, character, and experience.

3. Selection: The current Elders then select individuals from among the nominees to serve as new Elders. This may involve a period of prayer and discernment, as well as consultation with the congregation.

4. Appointment: The new Elders are then appointed and commissioned to serve in their role, typically in a public ceremony or worship service.

The role of the congregation in selecting Elders is an important one. By participating in the selection process, members of the congregation can help to ensure that the Elders who serve are well-suited to their role and are committed to serving the needs of the congregation. This can help to promote unity and accountability within the church and can help to ensure that the church is being led in a manner that is consistent with Biblical principles.

C. Multiplicity of Elders

1. Biblical Number of Elders: The scripture does not specify a particular number of Elders a local church should have. Biblical accounts are always the plural, “elders.” Thus, the number of Elders who serve in any given local church should be at least two. However, it is generally not advisable for a church elder board to have only two members, as there may be a risk of a lack of accountability and transparency, which could be detrimental to the functioning of the church. It ultimately depends on the specific circumstances of the church and the capabilities of the two individual Elders in question. An Elder board exists to provide oversight, guidance, and support for the church and its congregation. Having a larger group of elders can bring a diversity of perspectives and experiences, which can lead to better decision-making and more effective leadership.

2. Criterion of Number: The number of Elders in each church is typically determined by the size of the congregation, with larger congregations requiring a larger number of Elders to effectively serve the needs of the body. However, it is never wise to pad the Church with unqualified Elders just for the purpose of having more voices or supervision. The scripture has a strong warning against doing so, “Do not be hasty to lay hands on anyone and thus share responsibility for the sins of others…” 1 Tim 5:22. This means we “heap upon ourselves a portion of the responsibility for the damage they [the unqualified elder] will cause the people of God and the name of Christ.” (REV Commentary)

3. If a church has obtained federal or state corporate non-profit status, then a minimum or maximum number of “board members” may be specified. For example: Sections 48-53-101 through 48-53-104 of the Tennessee Code Annotated, requires that a “Tennessee nonprofit corporation must have at least three board members who are natural persons. We recommend at least seven directors, when possible.” In relation to a church, “board members” or “directors” is synonymous with elders.

Ultimately, the number of Elders on a given Elder Board should be determined by the needs of the church and the ability of the Elders to effectively carry out their duties. The focus should be on finding qualified and committed individuals who can serve the needs of the church and effectively lead the congregation in accordance with its beliefs and values.

D. Potential challenges in selecting Elders

Selecting Elders can be a challenging process for several reasons:

1. Limited pool of candidates: Depending on the size and demographics of the congregation, there may be a limited pool of candidates who meet the qualifications for Eldership.

2. Personal bias: It can be easy to allow personal biases or preferences to influence the selection process, leading to the appointment of individuals who may not be the most qualified or suitable for the position. This bias can come from the Elders themselves or members of the congregation.

3. Lack of discernment: Without discernment and prayerful consideration, it can be difficult to identify individuals who have the necessary spiritual gifts and character qualities to serve effectively as Elders.

4. Fear of conflict: The selection of Elders can sometimes lead to conflicts or disagreements within the congregation, especially if the candidate presented to them by the existing Elders, is not their personal preference.

5. Difficulty in evaluation: Evaluating the character and spiritual maturity of potential Elders can be challenging, as it often involves assessing intangible qualities such as integrity, humility, and wisdom.

6. The curse of the democratic mindset: The church is not a democracy, where the ultimate source of authority lies with the people. The church is a theocracy, where Christ rules his body through human agents called Elders. The Elders ask for the advice and consent of the congregation, not their permission. The ultimate and final decision in the selection of additional Elders is solely the purview of the Elders themselves. The challenge occurs when individuals do not understand this important biblical standard.

Overall, selecting Elders requires careful discernment, prayerful consideration, and a willingness to set aside personal biases and preferences in order to identify individuals who are best qualified to serve in this significant role. It is important to involve the congregation in the selection process, to seek wise counsel, and to approach the process with humility and a desire to seek God's will for the church.

E. Potential challenges in balancing Elder authority and congregational participation:

Balancing Elder and congregational authority can be a challenge in an Elder-Led form of church government. On the one hand, the Elders have been given the responsibility of leading the church and making decisions on behalf of the congregation. On the other hand, the congregation has a role to play in the life of the church and should have input into the decisions that are made.

Here are some potential challenges that can arise in balancing Elder authority and congregational participation:

1. Maintaining unity: When there is tension between the Elders and the congregation, it can be difficult to maintain unity within the church. The Elders must work to build trust and foster open communication with the congregation, while also being willing to make difficult decisions when necessary.

2. Ensuring accountability: The Elders must be self-accountable to the congregation for their decisions, while also maintaining their authority as leaders of the church. This can be a delicate balance, and the Elders must be willing to listen to feedback and make changes when necessary.

3. Managing conflict: When there are disagreements within the congregation, it can be difficult to manage conflict and find a resolution that is acceptable to everyone. The Elders must be skilled at conflict resolution and must be willing to collaborate with the congregation to find solutions that are in line with Biblical principles.

4. Encouraging participation: The Elders must work to encourage participation from the congregation, while also ensuring that the decision-making process is efficient and effective. This can be a challenge, as some members of the congregation may be hesitant to speak up or may not feel that their opinions are valued.

Overall, balancing Elder authority and congregational participation requires strong leadership, open communication, and a willingness to listen to feedback and make changes when necessary. When the Elders and congregation work together effectively, the church can thrive and grow in its mission to serve God and share the love of Christ with others.

VI. Challenges and potential pitfalls of Elder-Led church government

While there are many potential advantages to an Elder-Led form of church government, there are also some challenges and potential pitfalls to be aware of.

Some of these challenges include:

1. Potential for abuse of power: While Elders are chosen for their character and qualifications, there is always a risk that individuals may abuse their power or authority within the church community. This can lead to unhealthy dynamics, conflicts, and even spiritual abuse if left unchecked. Ultimately, addressing the risk of abuse of power requires a culture of humility and accountability among the Elders themselves. This might include regular self-assessment and reflection, a willingness to receive feedback and criticism, and a commitment to prioritizing the spiritual health and well-being of the congregation above personal agendas or interests. [To address this risk, it is important to have clear processes and procedures in place for addressing concerns or allegations of abuse of power. This might include a code of conduct for Elders, training on godly leadership and conflict resolution, and clear channels of communication for reporting and addressing concerns.]

2. Difficulty in decision-making: While an Elder-Led form of church government can promote effective decision-making, there is also a risk of gridlock or stagnation if there is disagreement or conflict among the Elders. This can make it challenging to move the church forward in a unified and purposeful way.

3. Lack of congregational involvement: While congregational input and feedback is important in an Elder-Led form of church government, there is a risk that the congregation may feel disconnected or disempowered if they are not given sufficient opportunities to participate in decision-making or leadership.

To address these challenges, it is important for Elders to be intentional about seeking out diversity of perspective and experience, promoting accountability and transparency in their decision-making, and fostering a culture of humility and openness to feedback. It is also important to prioritize the spiritual health and well-being of the congregation, and to seek out opportunities for congregational involvement and engagement in the life of the church.

VII. Conclusion

A. Recap of key points

Here is a recap of the key points regarding Elder-Led church government:

1. Elder-Led church government is a model in which a group of Elders provide spiritual leadership and decision-making for the church.

2. The biblical foundation for Elder-Led church government is found in passages such as Acts 20:28, 1 Timothy 3:1-7, and Titus 1:5-9.

3. Key qualifications for Elders include being of good character, able to teach, and having a history of faithful service to the church.

4. The responsibilities of Elders include providing spiritual leadership, shepherding the flock, overseeing church operations, and making decisions for the church.

5. Congregational involvement is important in an Elder-Led church, and may include opportunities for input and feedback, town hall meetings, and surveys.

6. Advantages of Elder-Led church government include strong spiritual leadership, effective decision-making, consistency and stability, and biblical soundness.

7. Potential challenges include abuse of power by Elders, lack of diversity in leadership, and insufficient congregational involvement and feedback.

8. To address these challenges, it is important to promote a culture of collaboration and partnership between the Elders and the congregation, as well as to ensure clear communication, well-defined roles and responsibilities, and a shared vision for the direction and priorities of the church.

B. Importance of implementing an effective Elder-Led church government

Implementing an effective Elder-Led church government is important for several reasons:

1. Spiritual growth: An effective Elder-Led church government can provide spiritual leadership and guidance that helps members of the congregation grow in their faith.

2. Effective decision-making: An Elder-Led model can enable the church to make timely and effective decisions, which can help to ensure that the church is able to respond to the needs of its members and the community.

3. Accountability: An Elder-Led model can promote accountability by providing a clear framework for decision-making and governance, which can help to prevent abuses of power and promote transparency and openness.

4. Consistency and stability: An effective Elder-Led church government can provide consistency and stability, which can be particularly important during times of change or crisis.

5. Biblical soundness: An Elder-Led model can help to ensure that the church's governance and decision-making aligns with biblical principles, which can help to promote the church's mission and values.

In short, implementing an effective Elder-Led church government is the biblical way to promote spiritual growth, effective decision-making, accountability, consistency and stability, and biblical soundness within the church, the body of Christ.

###

Nathan Lee Lewis has a B.A. in Religion/Pastoral Ministries from Ouachita Baptist University, Arkadelphia, Arkansas, and a B.A. in Radio, T.V., Film, from the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. He has also completed course work at California Baptist University, Riverside, California, Metrochurch School of Ministry, Edmond Oklahoma, Saint Michael’s Seminary, ICCEC, Sherman, Texas and Christ for the Nations Institute, Dallas, Texas. He is certified by the Hollywood Film Institute as a Cinema Director, Cinema Producer, and Line Producer. He was licensed to the Ministry in 1978, by Lincoln Avenue Baptist Church, Orange, California and Ordained to the Ministry at First Southern Baptist Church, Bryant, Arkansas. He was also tonsured a Reader in the Autonomous Orthodox Metropolia of North and South America and the British Isles. He has served on the staff of nine churches as Elder, Associate Pastor, Worship Pastor, and Youth Pastor. He has also served in various capacities in establishing local church start-ups in Arkansas and Tennessee. In 2022 he came to the Unitarian/Monotarian understanding of the Bible and became a layman. He has written numerous discipleship and other training materials, including a member training system exclusively for The Gideons International. He has also authored several screenplays, a novel, and hundreds of religious blog articles.