[Note: Father Steven Rogers is priest of
Saint Ignatius Orthodox Church in
Franklin, TN]
Saint Ignatius Orthodox Church in
Franklin, TN]
When my former priest in the Charismatic Episcopal Church set aside his Holy Orders in that communion to become Orthodox, other CEC priests looked East as well. Some of his fellow priests were dissuaded by those around them as they were made aware of various problems that exist in the Orthodox Church. I told him, "Father, just ask them,'would they rather deal with problems and know they are within the original true church or stay outside and deal with the same problems'?"
I will be careful not to use this follow-up to renege on that offer. But, I will say that he recognized my use of rhetoric to make a point. In other words, we agree on the true definition of "religious." His assertion, of course, is that the definition has changed and that to some it means "holier than thou". At our coffee, I would like to ask him how the anti-religious visitors they reach react when they realize there are requirements to following Christ and that becoming holy, in essence, means they must become holier than they are. The natural course of this is that they eventually become the "holier than thou."
Most who have an aversion to anything religious do so because they desire to stay the way they are. Most do not like religious people, not because the people have a self righteous attitude, but because the religious person shines light on the sinful state of their unholy lives. It is called light and darkness. Being religious is being the salt for this hurting world. Salt preserves and flavors but it also can sting. I'm afraid that the use of the redefined "religious" to mean"holier than thou" does not reach the anti-church or the un-churched, but rather is a shingle for pseudo religious people who want to continue living carnal lives with no consequences. Isn't this just a form of political correctness? Wouldn't this same method require the elimination of the very word "sin" and other objectionable religious words because of their inherent offensiveness?
So, we are remiss when we present an easy, non religious Christianity when our brothers across the world have been martyred by the millions and are being martyred at this very hour for their religious lives. Christians are the most martyred group on the planet and we in
the West continue to tickle the ears of potential converts. Whatever happened to, "Choose you this day whom you will serve?" We would do better to prepare all within the sound of our voice for the day when they will be called upon to deny Christ or die. It is already happening in public discourses with cries of "bring back the lions", with militant homosexuals storming churches, with religious freedoms being eroded and revisionist history taking its place, and with Islamic radicals sworn to our destruction. And slogans are what we have to offer?
Number three in a series of letters from SGT Daniel Nuoffer