A Summary Of The FMW/ROCOR Matter

Thanks to this JTO Anonymous Commenter for summarizing so adequately the JTO coverage of the Father Matthew Williams/ROCOR matter. This commenter was able to wade through the myriad of emotions and comments to clarify the issues as presented on this blog. The JTO Editor would welcome the commenter to submit future articles to be highlighted here. (Please contact: journeytoorthodoxy@gmail.com)

In summary, the 2004 rape allegations against Carole Stephen’s daughter have become a focal point for understanding how Matthew’s alleged abuse has been allowed to persist and why the current situation has escalated into a broader reckoning for the Church and its handling of abuse cases. And whom suppressed and covered for him.

1.Unresolved Allegations:

• The rape allegations from 2004 appear to have never been fully addressed or transparently resolved. This lack of resolution has left a shadow over Matthew’s character and ministry.

• The failure to hold Matthew accountable at the time created an environment where his behavior was not scrutinized, potentially allowing further abuse to occur.

2. Impact on Credibility:

• These past allegations have resurfaced in light of the current accusations of sexual and pastoral abuse. They add to the perception that there has been a pattern of harmful behavior that went unchecked for years.

• Many are questioning why someone with such serious allegations in their past was allowed to remain in a position of spiritual authority.

3. Erosion of Trust:

• The parish community is grappling with the knowledge that Matthew was allowed to continue as a priest despite such serious allegations, both past and present, which has eroded trust in the Church’s leadership and accountability mechanisms.

• The lack of transparency surrounding the current allegations has fueled anger, gossip, and speculation, contributing to the current climate of division and distrust.

4. Connection to Current Accusations:

• The resurfacing of the 2004 allegations has prompted many to see a pattern of abusive behavior, tying Matthew’s past actions to his alleged abuse of his children and parishioners.

• These connections have intensified calls for accountability, both for Matthew and for those who allowed him to remain in ministry.

5. Church Leadership’s Role:

• Questions are being raised about whether the Church’s leadership failed in its duty to investigate the 2004 allegations thoroughly and take appropriate action.

• This perceived negligence has contributed to the current crisis, as it suggests a broader failure to protect vulnerable individuals and address misconduct.

Comment Profile on Father Matthew Williams

The following comment is worthy of profile:

Unknown commented on "Source: "Fr. Matthew Is Severely Bipolar""

The situation of a woman enduring alleged mental abuse from her priest husband for 27 years, while he remained in ministry, raises serious ethical and moral concerns. While no one can fully understand the complexities of her circumstances, it’s important to reflect on why allowing this to continue unchecked was deeply problematic—not just for her but for the broader community.

"First, the priesthood is a position of immense trust and spiritual authority. If someone is abusive in their private life, it is reasonable to question their ability to lead others with integrity and care. Abuse in any form—mental, spiritual, or otherwise—can deeply harm the victims, and allowing such an individual to remain in ministry risks enabling further harm to others.

Second, enduring abuse silently, though often a result of fear or manipulation, can unintentionally enable the abuser to continue unchecked. In this case, the alleged victim’s silence meant that her husband’s abusive behavior could extend beyond their home and into the lives of parishioners. This raises the question of accountability: was there an opportunity to seek help or intervention that could have prevented harm to others?

Finally, transparency and accountability are essential in the Church, especially regarding those in positions of power. While it’s vital to approach such situations with compassion for the abused, it is also necessary to advocate for the protection of the broader community. Failing to address abuse—whether through silence, fear, or systemic inaction—can lead to widespread harm and erode trust in the Church’s leadership.

This situation underscores the importance of creating safe avenues for victims to report abuse and ensuring that leaders are held accountable. Abuse, whether in the home or in ministry, must never be tolerated, and the Church must prioritize protecting the vulnerable and ensuring that its leaders embody the virtues they are called to uphold.

Carole Stephens Comment

 

"The fact remains that Elizabeth and Matthew harassed my daughter at college to keep them safe once I found out about the assault and began my own investigation to pinpoint where to make my police report before the statute of limitations expired. This was twelve years ago. Elizabeth herself sent my daughter home crying and told her that no one should ever find out about this attack. Bipolar disorders are real, I guess, but also an excuse for bad behavior. Does that give a person license to shoot up a restaurant or a movie theater? Position is what she wanted to protect at great cost to my family. Had I found out after the event and still within my parental rights I would have prosecuted. It sounds like she didn’t protect her own children for the sake of position. What are you defending ? I knew them as newlyweds and five years before the assault on my child. Betrayal at its worst!"

Notable Commenter Exchange on Father Matthew Williams

 

A Monk Once Said...

 

Let those who weren't bitten advocate for those who were. 

Take time to heal.

Source: "Fr. Matthew Is Severely Bipolar"

From a verified source close to the situation:

Fr. Matthew is severely bipolar, diagnosed and medicated in 2004. He went off those medications in 2022, beginning a downward spiral at that time.

The present situation is caused by victims having flashbacks and remembering childhood events, not recent actions.

These accusations were known to the Metropolitan in Mid-September, by Fr. Matthew's own confession (The family of course made their own reports, and were thorough). Action was not taken until the first week of December despite much pressure from the family.

The family is in contact with local authorities regarding criminal charges. It is a long process requiring care and discretion. I obviously cannot say more.

The attitude of the hierarchy is that this should be quiet. It was represented to the family that it is their duty to forgive and forget. This is not an option.

A whole lot of people are making huge assumptions on limited information. I understand why they're doing this, but I have seen plenty of plain lies being thrown around. Hopefully this provides useful context.

None of the family are protecting Fr. Matthew. Any indication to the contrary is ridiculous.

I want to add that Matushka [Elizibeth Williams] was investigated for neglect, and was commended on her handling of Fr. Matthew by CPS. Their words: "You did it exactly right".

Biblical Unitarians: Who and What Are They?

Bill Schlegel lived for 30 plus years in Israel teaching Hebrew and Biblical Geography. It is not easy to dismiss him when he shares the plain meaning of the scripture. 

Father Matthew Williams Has "Formerly Resigned"

Father Matthew Williams has reportedly been allowed to resign his rectorship. His family, from which he is reportedly estranged, has been ordered not to attend either of the parishes formerly under his charge.

Even though ROCOR has taken some action in the matter of the alleged sexual crimes and misconduct of one of their priests, they seemingly did so via the current mounting pressure from numerous accusers. One might wonder however, why ROCOR allowed this suspended priest to resign rather than make an ecclesiastical decision to remove him. So, it was his choice? Is ROCOR about to do the RC thing and heal him, restore him, and send him back into a parish as a changed man?

This begs the question: What must a priest do and how many victims must come forward for you to determine that a ROCOR shepherd is a wolf?

In recent communications from ROCOR representatives the word "healing' is often used in regard to the victims of the recent event. (Although they are still deathly silent on the former matter of the alleged rape of the Stephens girl) ROCOR might garner more trust from its parishioners if they were to have said, "Father Matthew Williams has been removed from his rectorship."  ROCOR will only garner the trust of the victims, many of whom hold them accountable for their decade-long lack of action, if they finally say, "Father Matthew Williams has been defrocked and is no longer a ROCOR priest."

The JTO blog is a small media outlet but within the last few weeks has had over 14,000 views from over 40 countries/territories. Other outlets are now picking up the story such as Orthodox Christian Sexual Abuse Facebook Page. The JTO series Rape and the Holy Man was also recently linked on Donald Trump's Truth Social.

ROCOR, the world is watching, but more importantly, our Father Yahweh and his son and our messiah, Yeshua, the head of the church- your head- is watching.

ROCOR, in case you have forgotten, in case you lean more heavily on your tradition or policy in these matters, please remember that the Holy Scripture is the foundation of every tenant of faith and Saint Paul said, "I am writing so that you know how a person must conduct themselves in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth."

ROCOR, you don't have to guess! Once your "court" determines the validity of the accusations toward ANY clergy, Bishops included, this is the only template for action:

1 Cor. 5

"It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that is intolerable even among pagans: A man has his father’s wife. And you are proud! Shouldn’t you rather have been stricken with grief and have removed from your fellowship the man who did this?

Although I am absent from you in body, I am present with you in spirit, and I have already pronounced judgment on the one who did this, just as if I were present. When you are assembled in the name of our Lord Jesus and I am with you in spirit, along with the power of the Lord Jesus,

hand this man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved on the Day of the Lord.

Your boasting is not good. Do you not know that a little leaven works through the whole batch of dough? Get rid of the old leaven, that you may be a new unleavened batch, as you really are. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. Therefore let us keep the feast, not with the old bread, leavened with malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and of truth.

I wrote you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people.

I was not including the sexually immoral of this world, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters. In that case you would have to leave this world.

But now I am writing you not to associate with anyone who claims to be a brother but is sexually immoral

or greedy, an idolater or a verbal abuser, a drunkard or a swindler. With such a man do not even eat. What business of mine is it to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? God will judge those outside. 

Expel the wicked man from among you.”

"They Look Like Men"

 Full Article Here

"He said that at Protestant churches, the majority of the leaders “aren’t good, strong men”, whereas the Orthodox church leaders are more like “father figures”. He said: “They look like men. They look like fathers, they’re strong, spiritually, mentally, physically... I think young men right now are yearning to follow a good father.”

With the exception of ROCOR which knowingly ordains pedophiles and sexual abusers, and which has a Sexual Abuse Policy that favors the protection of the clergy rather than the victims? 

Father Seraphim, will you enlist some of those masculine men to encourage ROCOR to change their policy and to advocate for the protection of the clergy abuse victims? Apparently, some of their clergy have been allowed for years to be less than masculine fathers and anything but strong, spiritually, mentally and physically whole. ROCOR has a history of ignoring the petitions of the weak and fatherless and those who would advocate for them. Perhaps the ROCOR Hierarchy will listen to men with muscles?

Stand When Others Won't

My first B.A. degree was earned at a Baptist University. We were required to attend a chapel service which occurred once a week.

One such chapel service was honoring the ROTC program and its students. Several faculty and others were seated on the stage, and I was sitting toward the middle of the packed auditorium on the aisle seat.

At one point in the short one-hour service, the ROTC Color Guard, carrying the United States flag, began to process down the middle aisle. I immediately stood to my feet, as is the custom, out of respect and honor of our nation's emblem. A girl sitting next to me stood up when I did. I was surprised when no one else in the auditorium stood and thought that surely, at any second, a member of the faculty would issue the instruction for others to stand. The moment passed and no one did.

So, this left me and my cohort in an unintended act of patriotic rebellion, the only ones standing in a crowd of about 1000 during what seemed to be the longest ROTC Color Guard procession in history. Once the Color Guard stopped, my female friend, whom I had not previously met, joined me in sitting back down in our seats.

For a brief moment, I wondered if I had erred somehow. Should I have sat back down when I saw others weren't standing? I certainly didn't intend to make a statement but was doing what was the right thing to do. I quickly concluded that it was the 1000 students and our faculty who had erred. After the service, one of the faculty made a b-line for me and said, "Thanks for standing. We should have. We missed it there."

The righteous man does good even when no one is watching and sometimes when they are. Are you willing to Stand When Others Won't?

"So whoever knows the right thing to do 

and fails to do it, for him it is sin."

Freedom in Caring for Others

Brothers and sisters, if a person gets entrapped in some transgression, you who are spiritual restore such a one in a spirit of meekness, watching out for yourself so that you also will not be tempted. Carry one another’s burdens, and in this way fulfill the law of Christ. For if anyone thinks he is something when he is nothing, he is deceiving himself. But let each person examine his own work and then he will have reason for boasting in himself alone and not in another. For each person will have to carry his own load. The one who is being instructed in the word should share fully with the one who is instructing him in all good things. Do not be deceived: God is not mocked; for whatever a person sows, that will he also reap. For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption, but the one who sows to the spirit will from the spirit reap life in the age to come. Now let us not grow weary in doing what is good, for in due season we will reap if we do not give up. So then, while we have the opportunity, let us do good to all people, but especially to those who are of the household of the faith. Galatians 6: 1-10

Appeal To His Eminence NICHOLAS

 

His Eminence NICHOLAS

Metropolitan of Eastern America & New York,

First Hierarch of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia

Your Eminence,

Your people are hurting. It is partly due to the spiritual failures of your predecessor who ordained sexual predators even with much evidence of the nature of their character. It is also partially due to ROCOR's existing Sexual Abuse Policy that leans heavily toward protecting the clergy rather than the victims of sexual abuse in your churches. Rebuke, rewrite and retrain. This systemically flawed design in dealing with sexual predators in your ranks has trickled down to the clergy on every level. Those who would report the perpetrators of sexual abuse are met with obfuscation, intimidated and threats. Surely this is not what you want. Surely you can be the Shepherd who puts in place biblical principles regarding this leaven in the body of Christ and truly protect your sheep.

Your people are hurting. Lives are being destroyed, and souls are being lost under your watch. What will you now do? I appeal to you to take this matter out of the hands of those to whom it has previously been delegated and personally direct ROCOR toward true holiness.

I appeal to you to publicly confess the failures of ROCOR (regardless of what your attorneys or advisors may tell you). Be transparent/public in announcing a plan to correct this failure. To do otherwise at this juncture will assure that ROCOR continues its rapid trajectory toward civil humiliation and accountability.

"Come to an agreement with your accuser quickly, while you are with him on the road to court, otherwise your accuser may deliver you to the judge, and the judge deliver you to the guard, and you will be thrown into prison. Truly I say to you, you will absolutely not get out of there until you have paid the last quadrans."

Respectfully,

Nathan Lee Lewis

JTO Editor

NOTE: Public letters, such as the one posted here, have a better chance of bypassing the gatekeepers that are in place in such religious institutions. Those who have been personally affected by past or recent sexual abuse events in ROCOR may consider contacting:

Eastern American Diocese

140 E Ridgewood Avenue

Ste 415, S Tower

Paramus, NJ 07652

Diocesan Telephone: 201-940-7340

E-Mail: office@eadiocese.org

It is recommended that a second contact be made if there is no response, then a third, then a fourth...if need be.

"And he spoke a parable to them about the necessity for them always to pray, and not become discouraged. He said, “In a certain city there was a certain judge who did not fear God and showed no regard for people. And there was a widow in that city who kept coming to him, saying, ‘Give me justice against my opponent.’ And he would not for a while, but afterward he said to himself, ‘Though I do not fear God nor regard people, yet because this widow keeps bothering me, I will give her justice, lest she wear me out by her continual coming.’” And the Lord said, “Listen to what the unrighteous judge says. And will not God give justice to his chosen ones, who cry to him day and night? Will he delay long in helping them? I say to you, that he will give justice to them speedily. Nevertheless, when the Son of Man comes, will he find trust on the earth?”

Hey ROCOR, Do You Concur?

By: Andreozzi & Foote

March 15, 2022

Sexual Violence in Religious Institutions

In recent years, several high-profile investigations have uncovered a scale of sexual abuse in religious institutions that most Americans struggle to comprehend.

It is estimated that in the Catholic Church alone, tens of thousands of children worldwide may be affected.

Sexual abuse is one of the most serious violations of any person’s rights – let alone a child’s rights.

It is rightly condemned in all quarters of society but when it happens in religious institutions in which we place our trust and faith, it seems all the more horrific.

As further reports come to light, the main questions that need answering center on how to tackle sexual violence in religious organizations, hold the perpetrators accountable for their actions, and provide justice and support to the victims?

Child Sexual Violence In The Catholic Church And Beyond

Child sexual violence is not just wrong. It is a human rights violation that sickens most right-minded Americans and may even be a violation of the UN’s Convention Against Torture.

That abuse has affected many children within the Catholic Church around the world is now widely accepted – but the abuse stretches far beyond the jurisdiction of The Vatican.

The Church is an institution that parents, children, and people in all walks of life have historically placed a huge amount of trust in – and many still do.

In recent years, the institution has been pressured into releasing more details about sexual abuse against children by Catholic clergy but, in many cases, it has been less than transparent.

In the worst cases, rape and other forms of sexual violence against children have been uncovered.

Children have a right to bodily integrity, freedom from violence and sexual exploitation. The actions of employees and leaders in the Catholic Church violate children’s rights on many levels and this needs to be treated as a criminal act.

Victims frequently carry their experiences into their adult years and suffer psychological and behavioral problems as a result. Obtaining justice can bring a small measure of comfort.

Unfortunately, more information has come to light about the extent of the cover-ups and denials of justice for victims, serving to make the problem even worse.

The well-documented problems within the Catholic Church have also led to a light being cast upon other religious organizations in America and around the world.

This light is only getting brighter and has implicated institutions like Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Mormon Church, Jewish Synagogues, and others in child sexual abuse claims.

The Cover-up Of Abuse In Religious Institutions

The extent of the abuse problem within respected organizations in our society has surprised many.

Cases of sexual violence are not merely isolated incidents. A culture of impunity has helped the problem grow in religious institutions everywhere.

Perpetrators have been permitted to continue with their despicable acts due to a lack of accountability and transparency, entrenched power structures that do everything possible to protect the “status quo”, and a propensity to simply “sweep the problem under the carpet” rather than addressing it.

It is unfathomable for most Americans that, in many cases, the leaders of the institution in question were aware of a problem existing but did not act to stop it or simply “relocated” the problem elsewhere.

In many cases, the institution itself (including prominent and powerful leaders at the time) knowingly harbored perpetrators of sexual violence against children or covered up what they knew.

The Urgent Need For Accountability, Justice And Reform In Religious Institutions

There has never been a greater need for more transparency and accountability within organizations that are meant to present our values as a society.

Our children’s right to protection from violence must be upheld at all costs.

This starts with holding perpetrators accountable for their actions, bringing justice to victims, compensating them for their losses, and then reforming institutions to reduce the chances of the same mistakes being made in the future.

Religious institutions – and all organizations that we entrust our children to (including educational and sporting institutions) – must be scrutinized more closely to prevent the types of cover-ups we have seen in the past.

All religious institutions are against violence and should be prepared to change in order to practice what they preach rather than maintain outdated policies that have not worked to protect children in the past.

The Catholic Church recognizes that the UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child is “the most important among the rules of international law”.

Yet, the Church and many other religious organizations have shown a historic failure to deal effectively with people who repeatedly violate the basic rights of children.

If the Church is serious about its human rights obligations, it must hold itself to the tenets of the convention – and other religious organizations must also commit to them. It should start by choosing full disclosure of information over the self-preservation strategies that it has chosen in the past.

The more that victims come forward and seek justice, the more pressure will be put on religious institutions to introduce policies that affect real change – rather than just paying “lip service” to the idea of change.

The lawyers at Andreozzi & Foote are committed to helping victims of sexual violence and child abuse hold their institutions to account.

Rest assured that if you contact us, all the information provided will be treated confidentially, including your identity.

Start with a free and confidential consultation with one of our sexual abuse attorneys.

Agency in the Bible: The Human Person Jesus "was" The Father

William (Bill) Schlegel taught Bible history, geography and Hebrew in Israel for over three decades. He is the author of The Satellite Bible Atlas, making the scripture relevant to the geographical locations of the Holy Land. Bill moved to Tennessee, USA after he came to the Biblical Unitarian understanding of the scripture. He currently is the Hebrew translation scholar for the on-going REV Bible translation, as well as a speaker and podcaster.

The audio podcast below is from the Bill Schlegel - YouTube. Bill shares a rarely discussed topic of the role of the Messiah Yeshua as the agent of his father, Yahweh. Bill suggests that a failure to understand the principle of agency has led many, especially Trinitarians, to wrongly misinterpret some scriptures to say that Yeshua/Jesus was God the Son, rather than the Son of God.

Jesus Wasn’t Lying When He Said, “My Father Is Greater Than I”

Did God Wear Diapers?

...and, no, you can't say "it is just Jesus' human nature talking", because your own Council of Chalcedon established that Jesus' two (proposed) natures could not be divided.

"...be acknowledged in two natures, inconfusedly, unchangeably, indivisibly, inseparably; the distinction of natures being by no means taken away by the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved, and concurring in one Person and one Subsistence, not parted or divided into two persons, but one and the same Son, and only begotten, God the Word, the Lord Jesus Christ."

Rape and the Holy Man - Part Five - Too Much Liberty?

I recently received comments on JTO that were derogatory and demeaning character assassination attempts directed toward Carole Stephens, the mother in Rape and the Holy Man (see Parts One through Four). I refused to post them; I did post a JTO Editor comment encouraging the commenter not to use ad hominems. The anonymous commenter then turned his/her ad hominems on me, suggesting that I was a biased and poor journalist and a coward for refusing to post comments with which I didn't agree. When that verbal cudgel and manipulation didn't work, the commenter left it with "your gay LOL", and "I know this story firsthand, you do not."

The argument from authority that this commenter presents, is a logical fallacy. A journalist, investigator, interrogator, or Blog Editor, and the like, certainly do not have to have "been there" to find the facts and come to reliable conclusions. I do not present the matters of the current issue of sexual impropriety of Matthew Williams or the utter failure of ROCOR to advocate for the innocent, from a platform of authority. 

I approach my JTO posts on all matters from the perspective of 

 Fact, Opinion, Judgement, Inference, and Argument. 

I believe I present a balance and understanding of the difference between the five while always preferring to provide factual documentation when it is available as it is the most powerful ingredient of any argument.

That being said, the platform from which I speak about this current issue, was initiated from my "firsthand" experience which may not account for much in the eyes of some but should at least give the reader some perspective.

Here is my firsthand account and the platform from which I speak regarding Father Matthew Williams and ROCOR:

My wife and I served with Father Gregory Williams (Matthew's Williams' father). The church, Holy Annunciation, is in Liberty, TN. My wife, who worked with and was mentored by the Arkansas Chef of the Year, organized and planned the Sunday meals. We both acted as chanters for every service, often being joined by two of our five daughters. I eventually assisted Father Gregory at the altar. We also gave financially and regularly.

Although I was willing and made the offer, Father Gregory refused to allow me to assist him in his publishing house, St John of Kronstadt Press. He also refused my offer to travel with him and assist him on his Haiti mission trips.  His refusals seemed odd and cryptic, especially since he certainly needed the help with both.  After being there a while, I became aware of his practice of nude baptisms (both male and female) and his practice of kissing female parishioners on the lips in public. I was surprised at his wife's candor one day when she told me, "He loves women." He would go on periodic "walking trips", as his wife called them, to an undisclosed destination.

We left the church as Father Gregory became increasingly controlling, demanding and manipulative of our time, even when my wife was recovering from injuries from a fall. His attempt to sell us one of his houses was a red flag. Another parishioner had already bought a house from him, which the church still used as its own. Carole (mother), of Rape and the Holy Man also lived in one of Father Gregory's houses and made payments for years toward purchasing it, only to have it, according to her, snatched out from under her by Father Gregory. When we left, we were contacted by a parishioner who said we were just another few in the long line of good folks Father Gregory had "run off."

Father Gregory had many children. A man cannot be held responsible for all of the conduct of his various children, but there was much talk of sexual impropriety, partying and ruckus conduct by the boys. One of the sons, Matthew's brother, had been arrested for drug related crimes and reportedly admitted to his sexual escapades with female parishioners. When I walked the property, I discovered piles of discarded beer cans and bottles behind an abandoned barn on the property and other evidence of it being the local meeting place for wanton conduct and drunkenness. Another abandoned house was strewn with furniture, clothes, boxes of books and other household goods and a mattress or two on the floor.

I also investigated a couple of cabins on the property. Apparently, they had housed former parishioners and also were used by at least one of Father Gregory's sons. The cabin contained old furniture, various trash and numerous photos scattered about on the floor and table. The photos were of the son and "friends" partying, wrestling half-clad. Along with the beer cans, the houses, the drug-related crimes and the photos, it was obvious to me the nature of the environment in which the Williams children, including Matthew, were raised on that large piece of mountainous property. The less-than-wholesome environment was confirmed by Carole Stephen's experience as expressed in a letter she sent to Father Gregory.

Carole Stephens, our fellow Holy Annunciation parishioner, sent this letter to Father Gregory Williams, after later discovering that the then deacon Matthew Williams had allegedly sexually abused her 15-year-old daughter: Excerpt:

"I will need to speak to you.. and it should be with some representation. It is grossly unfair how I have been used and played by not only my husband, but also what was supposed to be my church. I thought of the church as being a refuge for many years. Had I known about the abuse behind the scenes of my precious daughter, I would have not invested so many years of dedicated suffering and hard-earned money. Nothing is worth the price of supplying cheap little whores for sons who are unseemly. I can only say that at least John was upfront about his misdeed, with his wild parties and proclamations of not loving his wife as he solicited the teenage and young women of the parish... he was easy to avoid. But my [daughter]? As a silent victim? I am in a vice and being held very accountable by the Stephens for this unspeakable crime against a once pious promising [school omitted] student, whose spiritual life was sabotaged by none other than God parents of my family. And when I was trying so hard to have a win."

It was in this environment that Carol Stephens lived with her many children, sons and daughters. Her house was not on Holy Annunciation's 400-acre plot of property but was close enough for the family to walk. Her children basically grew up there, being homeschooled and attending services. The dispute over the sale of Father Gregory's house to Carole occurred after Carole's husband became estranged from the family, leaving her the sole provider. The house was in desperate shape with holes in the floor and leaks here and there. I drove Carole home one day but could not drive all the way up to the house because a deep hole in the dirt driveway made it impassable.

At some point, Matthew and Elizabeth Williams became Godparents to some of Carole's children. One of the daughters at age 15 would later babysit for her Godparents and on one such overnight job would allegedly be raped by Matthew Williams. "I knew I shouldn't have left him alone with her", Elizabeth would allegedly tell Carole later.

I recall one of the after-service meals where Carole arrived late, but Father Gregory would not allow her to eat or stay. I was told the reason for this rejection was because she had missed services. I remember feeling that that decision was quite cruel and a punishment of sorts. Carole says the reason for the rejection was because she had recently brought up the accusation of Matthew Williams' sexual assault to her priest, Father Gregory Williams.

...And the persecution and effort to silence Carole began. Father Gregory sent a letter to Carole in answer to the appeal letter sent out to him and others. It included:

"The incident to which you refer (of which neither Matushka Anastasia nor I knew anything till about a year and a half ago) occurred many years ago. The son in question (also unidentified) was an adult, living away from home. The partner/victim was a minor, but has never contacted us in any way; all we "know" even now is exceedingly vague and mostly 3rd or 4th party hearsay... I can only assume that your purpose in broadcasting this letter (I can only identify about 2/3 of the recipients, most of whom have nothing whatever to do with these issues) is to inflict harm on our family and the Church community..."

After Father Gregory Williams was found dead in an outdoor hot tub on the Holy Annunciation property, his son in law, Father Christopher Stanton, moved to the property with his wife, Matthew's Williams' sister, to become priest of the parish. From there, Father Christopher issued a letter to Carole which included the warning not to "slander" Matthew Williams, thus continuing their family's effort to diminish her.

The persecution of Carole Stephens continues to this day by various clergy, in particular the clergy of ROCOR... and, of course, attackers like our "your gay LOL" anonymous commenter. 

"But no one is able to subdue the human tongue. It is a restless evil full of deadly poison. With it we bless the Lord and Father, and with it we curse people, who have been made according to the likeness of God. Out of the same mouth comes blessing and cursing. My brothers and sisters, these things should not be this way." James 3: 8-10

Also See:

Rape and the Holy Man - The Alleged Sexual Crime of a ROCOR Priest

Rape and the Holy Man - Part Two - Appeal of a Mother

Rape and the Holy Man Part Three - All Are Punished!

Rape and the Holy Man Part Four - Sincerely, Carole Anne Stephens

Happy New Year - ROCOR Style

Proverbs 31:8-9

“Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves; ensure justice for those being crushed. Yes, speak up for the poor and helpless, and see that they get justice.”

ROCOR, You cannot now expect to be given "time" to deal with the issue of sexual predators in your midst. You cannot now play the victim. "Oh, the evil one is accusing the church!" No. It is you- "Thou art the man", the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia, who has facilitated the evils to abound in your midst. It is the righteous who are accusing the church. 

You knew. You have known for years. Father Anastasy P. Yatrelis allegedly knew within hours of the alleged sexual assault of the 15-year-old Stephens girl. How did he allegedly know? Well, contrary to the circle-the-wagons ROCOR narrative, she REPORTED IT. SHE CAME FORWARD. (Please forgive all-caps shouting, but you don't seem to be hearing very well.) She phoned Yatrelis. She had a conversation with Yatrelis. Did any of your ROCOR investigators ask Yatrelis about that conversation prior to the late Metropolitan Hilarion's statement that the investigation "was curtailed due to lack of accusation on the part of the alleged victim" ?

Father Anastasy P. Yatrelis

Did anyone in the ROCOR Hierarchy or anyone who was empowered to deal with such matters, respond personally to the mother, Carole Stephens, all those years ago? No. How about now? In light of the current circumstances and new accusations, have you contacted Carole Stephens? Do you intend to? She has always been willing to meet. She is willing to meet now. Are you? (journeytoorthodoxy@gmail.com)

Does ROCOR Have A Systemic Problem?

This is a link to an article originally started in October of 2022 and just finished today 12/28/2024. In light of current events regarding St Tikhon and Father Matthew Williams, a relevant question arises:

Does ROCOR have a systemic problem 

regarding the mishandling of sexual predators?

Read: 

     Sex and the Seminarian - A ROCOR Systemic Problem?

ROCOR and Sexual Misconduct

 The Policy and Procedures of the Synod of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia Regarding Sexual Misconduct by Clergy

 INTRODUCTION 

Allegations of sexual misconduct by the clergy or other representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia (the "Church") cause grave concern to the Church and its members and must be diligently investigated, given the potentially devastating effects they may have upon spiritual and emotional well-being of the victims, their families and friends and the community as a whole. The Church condemns any form of sexual misconduct, especially the sexual abuse of children, as these actions are devastating to not only the victims, but to their families and the community. Moreover, such actions are morally wrong and undermine the faith of many of people with regard to the Church and its clergy. The Church recognizes and shares the pain and suffering of the victims of sexual misconduct, and is eager to address that suffering in order to promote healing of all those who are harmed. The Church expects all its clergymen to abide by the Guidelines for the Clergy of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia (adopted by the Council of Bishops in 1956) in all their actions. The Church also seeks "to protect the ecclesio-social and personal life of the members of the Church from violations of the rules of Christian morality" ( Regulations on the Ecclesiastical Court and Legal Procedures of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Of Russia ). The Church is committed to acting swiftly and fairly toward every person involved in an effort to determine the veracity of the allegations, determine what actions, if any, must be taken and offer spiritual and emotional support to those in need. The policies set forth herein have been adopted and published by the Church in order to ensure that the Church responds appropriately to allegations of sexual misconduct. This policy shall to apply to the clergy of the Church, including but not limited to: bishops, priests, monks and deacons who are serving in our parishes, schools and institutions. Priests, brothers and sisters who are members of religious orders and lay persons employed by institutions within the Church are properly subject to the direction and supervision of their religious superiors or employers, as the case may be, and we will work with those superiors or employers to address any situations which may develop. This does not mean that any allegations against these persons are to be taken any less seriously; however, direct jurisdiction for matters involving these persons lies with their religious superiors or employers. With the intention to help those who have been hurt by sexual abuse and other forms of sexual misconduct, and also to make every effort to prevent such incidents from occurring, the Church also invites suggestions as to how this policy might be improved and best implemented in order to meet its goals.

 I. SEXUAL ABUSE INVOLVING CHILDREN 

 A. Policy The Church will respond to complaints of sexual abuse made against a priest or other clergy with justice, compassion and charity. In this regard, all persons involved are to be respected and treated with dignity and love, whether it be the person making a complaint of sexual abuse, the family of that person, the clergyman against whom the complaint is made, the parish or the broader Church community. 

 B. Procedures Any person who intends to make a complaint of sexual abuse against a bishop, priest or deacon of the Church, or against any other clergyman, including subdeacon or psalm-reader, or against a parish warden (starosta), may telephone or may write to their 

Diocesan Office of Clergy Personnel at 75 East 93rd Street, New York, NY 10128, telephone 212-534-1601 

(if writing, please indicate a way that you may be contacted, either in writing, or by telephone). The person making the complaint is assured of an understanding and respectful reception. In some instances, a complaint is first brought to a local priest or an official of a school or other Church institution. In such cases, the person receiving the complaint must advise the person making the complaint that the allegation and the identity of the person making the complaint will, to the extent possible and desired, be maintained as confidential. The person receiving the complaint must also make every effort to encourage the person who has made the complaint to contact the Office of Clergy Personnel directly. The person making the complaint is encouraged to be open and forthcoming with all relevant information in order for the Church to properly investigate the allegations, and, where appropriate, address the problem and ensure that victims receive any pastoral or other appropriate care that is needed. 

There are three judiciary levels in the Church, these being the Diocesan Court, the Court of the Synod of Bishops and the Court of the Council of Bishops. In accordance with the Regulations on the Ecclesiastical Court , "Clergymen are subject to the due process established by law in the civil courts in cases of the violation of civil laws or directives of authorities, or finally, the commission of such political or criminal crimes which may at times entail condemnation and punishment by the Church." Also, "Persons occupying administrative positions within the parish, e.g. the rector, the church warden, members of parish councils and auditing committees, and others in responsible positions in parish organizations, in respect of improper or illegal acts that they have committed, may be judged by the Diocesan Court if these acts lead to the harm and detriment of the parish… and also bring about the… moral decline of the parish… or lead to the harm or detriment of individuals who have lodged a complaint against the incorrect or illegal acts of the parish administration before the Church authorities." In all its procedures, the Church is committed to the careful observance of the civil law as well as the canon law of the Church and the Regulations on the Ecclesiastical Court . The Church shall endeavor to fulfill all legal obligations concerning the reporting of such complaints to the proper civil authorities. The person who brings an allegation against a clergyman will be advised of other reporting options available, in addition to reporting the allegations of the Church. The Church treats all complaints as serious. Even if the complaint made against a priest or deacon does not initially appear to be credible, the Church shall nevertheless take every reasonable step to examine the complaint. However, anonymous or otherwise vague and unspecific complaints may be extremely difficult to investigate and deal with, and, therefore, all persons making a complaint are strongly urged to be as factually specific as possible. The person making the complaint is given the opportunity to relate the details of the complaint personally to the Office of Clergy Personnel and/or to another appropriate representative of the Church. During this interview, the person making the complaint may be accompanied by another person, such as a family member, a friend, an attorney or another trusted adviser. The clergyman involved is informed of the complaint made against him. However, prompt action by the Church in response to the complaint is not, and should in no way be perceived as, a determination of guilt of the clergyman. A meeting between the clergyman and the Church is arranged to review the complaint. During such a meeting, the clergyman has the right to be accompanied by an adviser of his choosing, whether it be a friend or family member, an attorney, or another trusted person. If the clergyman against whom the complaint is made admits to its truth, he is immediately referred for clinical evaluation to determine the appropriate type of professional help that will be needed. He is also removed from his ministry and may have other restrictions placed on him. If the complaint initially appears to be credible, those who may have been abused are offered appropriate pastoral care and other assistance--including professional treatment--as may be needed, which is determined on an individual basis. In the case of any complaint that initially appears to be credible, or if the findings of the preliminary inquiry are inconclusive, the priest or deacon will be referred for clinical evaluation. The clergyman may also be temporarily removed from his ministry and may have other restrictions placed on him. If a clergyman is removed from his assignment, the appropriate person or persons from the affected parish or other ministry are informed of the reason for the removal, so that they in turn will be able to respond in a pastorally-sensitive way to the needs of the parish or other affected community. Decisions regarding any public statements must be made on a case-by-case basis; these decisions must balance the desire for confidentiality on behalf of the person bringing the complaint, the rights of the clergyman against whom the complaint has been brought, and the need and desire to identify and minister to others who may have been harmed by any wrongdoing. If a clergyman receives a clinical evaluation, based upon the recommendations of professionals of such evaluation, he may be referred for treatment. The person who has made the complaint is presented to so that a determination may be made on what steps are appropriate in light of the complaint. Both the person who has brought the complaint and the clergyman have an opportunity to review the summary and to respond to it in writing. The factual summary, and any response by the person who has brought the complaint and/or by the clergyman, will be placed in the personnel file of the clergyman. Personnel files of a clergyman are to be consulted in connection with any future assignments. In the final determination is that the complaint is unfounded, the clergyman will be given ongoing support and assistance, as and when needed, in light of the tremendous suffering of a priest or deacon who has been falsely accused. If he has not been removed from ministry, any public statement will depend on the notoriety of the matter and will take into account the wishes of the priest or deacon involved. If the clergyman has been temporarily removed from ministry, and upon determination that the complaint was unfounded, a return to ministry will take place after consultation with him to ascertain his wishes. Decisions regarding any possible reassignment of a clergyman who has engaged in sexual abuse are made on a case-by-case basis. Reassignment to a parish ministry is rarely appropriate, although there may be ministries in which the clergyman can serve under supervision and subject to certain limitations. Because of the complex nature of each individual case, there can be no hard and fast rules about reassignment. However, when such decisions are contemplated, several factors are used in evaluating the possibilities of reassignment. Among these factors are the recommendations of the professionals involved in treating the clergyman, the feelings of the person who suffered the sexual abuse, and the availability of an assignment where the priest or deacon will be able to exercise ministry within appropriate limits. Care and concern will be given to altering the appropriate person or persons in a situation when and if a reassignment is made in order to ensure proper follow up. 

 II. OTHER SEXUAL MISCONDUCT To the extent that the above procedures are appropriate in cases where a clergyman is accused of sexual misconduct not involving sexual abuse of children, these procedures are applied. Determinations are made on a case-by-case basis. However, the policy of the church with regard to sexual abuse of children applies to other forms of sexual misconduct, and such complaints are responded to with justice, compassion and charity for all persons involved. Complaints of other sexual misconduct should also be made to the Office of Priest Personnel of the Church.

 III. Omitted?

 IV. SEXUAL ABUSE OCCURRING IN PARISHES OF THE CHURCH Although the Church may have ecclesiastical authority over its parishes, which are subject to the canon law of the Church, the Church does necessarily have the same legal authority over all of its parishes as civil courts may. Accordingly, the Church may not be able to strictly enforce this policy with respect to those parishes which resist the Church's involvement in complaints and/or allegations of sexual misconduct or sexual abuse by priests, deacons, brothers, sisters or employees of such parishes. However, the Church is committed to the importance of the implementation of this, or a similar policy in all of its parishes and will endeavor to ensure that all complaints and/or allegations of sexual misconduct or sexual abuse are handled by its parishes in a manner consistent with this policy. 

 SYNOD OF BISHOPS, December, 2005