Translate

Wednesday, January 29, 2025

Elizabeth Williams: "I do question his mental stability at present."

A letter, reportedly from Elizabeth Williams, wife of Father Matthew Williams, has been made public. JTO is releasing the content here: Note: This letter has not been verified as having been sent or received. Void of a signature, it cannot be authenticated. 

                Monday, October 28, 2024 

Dear Fr Serge, 

Your blessing! Things are continuing to deteriorate as Fr Matthew will not respect my daughter and my requests for space. In very clear words, I asked him not to come to the farm/house today as we were emotionally exhausted after he took [Child A] without my consent and slept with her alone in his car in the middle of the night at a rest stop and the various other ways in which he disregarded Fr John's directives to not be alone with the girls or to come around us without my explicit permission. Disregarding my requests, and Fr John once again reminding him to get permission, on the contrary, he arrived at our house this morning and tried to get in. I messaged him asking him to honor my and [Child Victim]'s explicit requests for him to not be there (for one day only!), but he proceeded to work on repair projects under the house and waited until the children woke up and let him in. Father, I am trying to avoid a scene in front of the small children, so I did not say anything when he came in, but quickly left the property with the children. I messaged Fr John and he sent Fr Matthew a text asking him to leave and not return without my permission. With Fr John's blessing, I am now applying for a restraining order as he will not listen to his spiritual father, or his family. My daughters have made it clear that they will report him to child protective services if he does not stop putting their little sisters at risk by being alone with them sleeping in cars, in bedrooms (he took Lucy from me the other night at his mother's and snuck off and lay down in a bed alone with her), etc. I'm afraid that this is where we are. I do question his mental stability at present. He has a history of violence towards me and towards himself when I don't submit to him and I am concerned for my, and the children’s safety at this time. The restraining order will bar him from speaking to the children or entering the property until a court date. He is spreading rumors to the [Names] and others that I am mentally unstable and seeking extramarital affairs. As God and my spiritual father as my witnesses, there is absolutely no foundation in those accusations. These are projections of his own sins. That I have been extremely emotionally and physically drained by all of this drama and revelation of abuse, with this, I would wholeheartedly concur. Trying to care for and educate five children single-handedly is absolutely exhausting. Adding in trying to be an emotion support to parishioners as a matushka, along the grief of my spouse's many betrayals would tax anyone. Those who know me and spend time with me on a regulate basis (this excludes the [Names]) can testify to my mental stability better than I, and I would encourage anyone concerned about such to simply ask our joint spiritual father or family members on both sides which of the two of us has a history of mental instability. I confess and have sought guidance from Fr John on a nearly weekly basis for the twenty seven years I have been in the Church. I put my trust in God, and ask your prayers! Please feel free to share this with the metropolitan at your discretion. 

 
In Christ, Elizabeth






Father Matthew Williams Blames Medication

A text from Father Matthew Williams has been made public in which he blames psychiatric medication for his sexual crimes. He states the problem began in 2012, which begs the question: To what does he attribute the cause of his sexual crimes which occurred before that year? Was it a vitamin deficiency, perhaps? Read Rape and the Holy Man.

True confession and repentance is a vital part of redemption. Anything less is deception and fraud. Are you listening, ROCOR?


 

Where is the Trinity in the Bible?

2:55 minutes may ruin your religion. Can you handle it? Have you been told the truth about the history of the Orthodox Councils? For instance, did you know the doctrine of the Trinity was not even formulated until the middle of the 5th century in the Council of Chalcedon?

Friday, January 24, 2025

Another Cover-up

It seems the Orthodox hierarchy have been engaged in cover-ups for quite a while.


Start asking your priest and bishops questions about the origins of the Trinity doctrine and don't allow them to use the cover-up word, "mystery". 

Here... this will save you some time.
Is this what you believe? Your hierarchy does:



"The Mysteries" has become a noun, an Orthodox catch phrase, for doctrines that cannot be found anywhere in the scriptures and for which the hierarchy can offer no viable explanation. You have been taught to accept that and to not question lest you be considered rebellious, disobedient, and heretical. If your Father God is not afraid of your questions, why is your hierarchy?

2 Timothy 2:15
Be diligent to present yourself approved before God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth.

It seems we are to present ourselves approved before God and not depend on a priest, bishop, or Ecumenical Council to rightly handle the word of truth for us.


Thursday, January 23, 2025

Truth, Tradition, And the Trinity


28 And when all things have been put in subjection to him, then the Son will subject himself to Him who put all things in subjection to him, so that God is all in all.

NOTE: When you decide to "Be diligent to present YOURSELF approved before God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth," then you may ask yourself why you are depending on a hierarchy to present you as approved before God. If you are willing to "work out your own salvation with fear and trembling", then also be willing to continue reading.

1) Basic Problems with the doctrine of the Trinity (REV Commentary)

The word “Trinity” is not in the Bible. Although that does not rule out the possible existence of the Trinity, it is supporting evidence that the doctrine is unbiblical.

Trinitarians differ, sometimes greatly, in their definitions of the Trinity. The Eastern Orthodox Church differs from the Western Church on the relation of the Holy Spirit to the Father and the Son. Also, Trinitarians who hold to the “classic” definition of the Trinity, that Jesus was 100% God and 100% man while on earth, believe differently from Kenotic Trinitarians, who believe that Jesus set aside his godhood while he was a man on earth. Oneness Pentecostals say the classic formula of the Trinity is completely wrong. Yet all these claim that Christ is God and that the Bible supports their position.

A study of the history of the Christian Church shows a definite development in the doctrine of the Trinity over the centuries. For example, the early form of the Apostles’ Creed, believed to date back to shortly after the time of the apostles themselves, does not mention the Trinity or the dual nature of Christ. Furthermore, it only states, “I believe in ‘the holy spirit,’” which could just as easily refer to the gift of holy spirit as it could to a third “Person” in the Trinity. The Nicene Creed, written in AD 325 and modified later, added the material about Jesus Christ being “eternally begotten” and “true God,” and about the Holy Spirit being “Lord.” But it was the Athanasian Creed, most likely composed in the late 400s or early 500s AD, that was the first creed to explicitly state the doctrine of the Trinity, and it includes that if a person does not believe it, he is not saved but will perish everlastingly. Yet saying that a person who does not believe in the Trinity is not saved contradicts the Bible. For example, when Peter addressed the Jews on the Day of Pentecost he did not mention the Trinity or that Jesus was God in the flesh, yet about 3,000 people in the audience were saved (Acts 2:41).

One of the most convincing arguments for Biblical Unitarianism is that God is never described as being composed of “three.” Not “three,” “three-in-one,” “Father, Son and Holy Spirit,” or three Persons making up one God. Many Trinitarians point to Matthew 28:19 which lists the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, but it does not call the three of them “God.” Matthew 28:19 is not defining God, it is stating the authority by which disciples will baptize: by the authority of God, of Christ, and by the power of the holy spirit. Simply mentioning three things together does not make them “God.” For example, if Matthew 28:19 read, “Baptize them in the ‘name’ (i.e., authority) of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob,” that would not make those three people “one Person.”

Also, the two natures of Jesus (him being fully God and fully man) are completely, absent from the scriptures. Jesus is never said to have two natures, two personalities, two minds, two spirits within him. He is always viewed as one person with one mind.

Trinitarians say the “Threeness” of the Trinity is just as vital as his Oneness, but never once does the Bible mention God’s “Threeness,” whereas it mentions His Oneness many times (e.g., Deut. 4:35; 6:4; Isa. 44:6, 8; John 5:44; 17:3; 1 Cor. 8:6).There are no verses that define God as being Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
  • There are no verses that define God as three, three in one, or a multiple.
  • There are no verses that say that Jesus has two natures or two minds.
  • There are no verses that say Jesus is a God-man, or that he is fully God and fully man.
  • There are no verses that call Jesus “eternally begotten,” the bible says he was begotten or “born” by Mary
It seems that if the doctrine of the Trinity was genuine and central to Christian belief as almost all Trinitarians claim, and especially if belief in it was necessary for salvation as many Trinitarians teach, it would have been clearly stated in the Bible and in the earliest Christian creeds.
The Trinity is not “hidden,” and it is not a “mystery,” it simply isn’t there.
REV 

WARNING: Seeking truth may ruin your religion. Have faith! There is abundant life outside of Orthodoxy.



Jesus Was Not A Trinitarian

Order On Amazon

There is a growing concern among evangelical scholars that evangelicalism, its doctrine of God and of the Gospel, may not be as securely rooted in Scripture as is often uncritically imagined. The accounts of the historical Jesus and his saving teaching, given us in three corroborating reports in Matthew, Mark and Luke, are often played down in favor of a set of verses from the letters of Paul. That "treadmill" of favorite evangelical proof-texts also relies heavily on John's Gospel. This unbalanced use of Scripture results in a distortion of Jesus' claim to be Messiah, Son of God, in relation to his Father whom he defined as "the only one who is truly God" (John 17:3).

The crux of the problem lies in this fact: Jesus' own very Jewish creed, which he affirmed as the most important truth of all in agreement with a Jewish scribe (Mark 12:28-34), has been allowed no voice in the traditional creeds recited in Church. Worse still, when the unitary monotheistic creed of Jesus and Paul is advanced as the necessary bedrock of good Christian thinking, its exponents are likely to be charged with upsetting the longstanding findings of the church councils. They are even made unwelcome in church settings.

Anthony Buzzard invites scholars and laymen alike to take seriously Jesus' Jewish creed, his recitation of the Shema, "Hear, O Israel," which proclaims God to be one single Lord. Defining God and His Son biblically remains part of the unfinished work of the Reformation. The evidence placed before the reader shows that a major paradigm shift is needed if Christians are to worship their God in spirit and in truth, uncluttered by the philosophical and confusing ideas of God which form part of received church tradition. Buzzard's thesis has enormous significance for the discussion among three great world religions -- Christianity, Judaism and Islam.

Choose You This Day Whom You Will Serve

 Why are you still a Democrat?

Senate Democrats Unanimously Defeat Anti-Infanticide Bill — Would Require Doctors to Save Babies Born Alive During Abortion Procedures


A Mother Maligned

Carole Stephens, the mother in Rape and the Holy Man, shared this early email exchange with JTO. After an initial letter of support, Carole Stephens says a priest she consulted, Father Kent McCaffery, changed his tune, questioning the veracity of the story and her other children's testimony regarding the event with her daughter. 

"An old email from Fr. Kent back in the day.  If you post it take [daughter's] name out.  Fr. Kent ended up gaslighting me and calling my older siblings liars for bringing it up with me. [Redacted sentence].    Everyone thought I was a trouble maker in the day." 

Dear to Christ Juliana, [*]

[Daughter] was a child when this happened. She was grievously assaulted and then coerced into silence and cover up. Horrible violence has been done to [daughter]. The fact that [daughter] is now an adult is immaterial. You still have a mother's responsibility to report this horrible crime to ROCOR and to law enforcement and to seek legal council. If you choose to fulfil your responsibility you should send a written complaint against Fr. Matthew and his Matushka stating the facts as you know them. Make sure that you keep copies of all correspondence you have had with all parties involved. May God give you grace to do the right thing for the glory of Christ's Kingdom.

Address to send complaint to ROCOR:

His Eminence Metropolitan Hilarion (Kapral) 

Synod of Bishops
75 E. 93 Street
New York, NY 10128

I am praying for Christ to strengthen and comfort you in this trying matter.

Blessings to you!


Carole Stephens did report it to ROCOR.

*NOTE: Juliana is Carole Stephen's baptismal name.

A Summary Of Elizabeth William's Role

Another clarifying summary from an Anonymous commenter on: 

Elizabeth’s Role in Covering Up and Remaining Silent

1. Silence About Personal Abuse:
• Elizabeth allegedly endured mental abuse from Matthew for 27 years but did not report or address it publicly. Her silence allowed him to continue serving as a priest without his personal conduct being scrutinized, which indirectly enabled further harm.
2. Active Cover-Up of Past Allegations:
• Elizabeth is accused of playing a direct role in covering up the 2004 rape allegations involving Carole Stephen’s 15-year-old daughter.
• Allegedly, she attempted to buy the victim’s silence, offering money in exchange for not pursuing the accusations further.
• In addition, Elizabeth is said to have bullied and pressured the victim into staying quiet, potentially using her position as the priest’s wife to intimidate or manipulate the situation.
3. Failure to Protect the Vulnerable:
• Rather than advocating for justice or supporting the victim, Elizabeth’s alleged actions may have contributed to suppressing the truth and shielding Matthew from accountability.
• This enabled him to continue his role as a priest, where he allegedly perpetuated pastoral abuse, harming other parishioners spiritually, emotionally, and psychologically. As well as his own alleged abuse against his own children.
4. Complicity Through Inaction and Action:
• By remaining silent and not reporting to law enforcement about her own abuse and her children’s sexual abuse and actively working to suppress the allegations against Matthew, Elizabeth played a role in maintaining the facade of his moral and spiritual authority.
• Her alleged actions have been interpreted as prioritizing the protection of her family’s reputation over justice and the safety of others.
5. Impact of the Cover-Up:
• The attempts to silence the 2004 victim and the long-standing inaction have had significant consequences, leading to further harm within the parish community.
• These actions have fueled distrust, anger, and division, as the community grapples with the extent of the cover-up and its impact on other victims.
6. Moral Responsibility:
• While Elizabeth may have been a victim of mental abuse herself, her alleged role in covering up Matthew’s actions and silencing a victim has raised serious ethical questions.
• Her actions have not only delayed justice for those harmed but also perpetuated a culture of silence and unaccountability within the Church..

A Summary Of The FMW/ROCOR Matter

Thanks to this JTO Anonymous Commenter for summarizing so adequately the JTO coverage of the Father Matthew Williams/ROCOR matter. This commenter was able to wade through the myriad of emotions and comments to clarify the issues as presented on this blog. The JTO Editor would welcome the commenter to submit future articles to be highlighted here. (Please contact: journeytoorthodoxy@gmail.com)

In summary, the 2004 rape allegations against Carole Stephen’s daughter have become a focal point for understanding how Matthew’s alleged abuse has been allowed to persist and why the current situation has escalated into a broader reckoning for the Church and its handling of abuse cases. And whom suppressed and covered for him.

1.Unresolved Allegations:
• The rape allegations from 2004 appear to have never been fully addressed or transparently resolved. This lack of resolution has left a shadow over Matthew’s character and ministry.
• The failure to hold Matthew accountable at the time created an environment where his behavior was not scrutinized, potentially allowing further abuse to occur.
2. Impact on Credibility:
• These past allegations have resurfaced in light of the current accusations of sexual and pastoral abuse. They add to the perception that there has been a pattern of harmful behavior that went unchecked for years.
• Many are questioning why someone with such serious allegations in their past was allowed to remain in a position of spiritual authority.
3. Erosion of Trust:
• The parish community is grappling with the knowledge that Matthew was allowed to continue as a priest despite such serious allegations, both past and present, which has eroded trust in the Church’s leadership and accountability mechanisms.
• The lack of transparency surrounding the current allegations has fueled anger, gossip, and speculation, contributing to the current climate of division and distrust.
4. Connection to Current Accusations:
• The resurfacing of the 2004 allegations has prompted many to see a pattern of abusive behavior, tying Matthew’s past actions to his alleged abuse of his children and parishioners.
• These connections have intensified calls for accountability, both for Matthew and for those who allowed him to remain in ministry.
5. Church Leadership’s Role:
• Questions are being raised about whether the Church’s leadership failed in its duty to investigate the 2004 allegations thoroughly and take appropriate action.
• This perceived negligence has contributed to the current crisis, as it suggests a broader failure to protect vulnerable individuals and address misconduct.


Wednesday, January 22, 2025

Comment Profile on Father Matthew Williams

The following comment is worthy of profile:


The situation of a woman enduring alleged mental abuse from her priest husband for 27 years, while he remained in ministry, raises serious ethical and moral concerns. While no one can fully understand the complexities of her circumstances, it’s important to reflect on why allowing this to continue unchecked was deeply problematic—not just for her but for the broader community.

"First, the priesthood is a position of immense trust and spiritual authority. If someone is abusive in their private life, it is reasonable to question their ability to lead others with integrity and care. Abuse in any form—mental, spiritual, or otherwise—can deeply harm the victims, and allowing such an individual to remain in ministry risks enabling further harm to others.

Second, enduring abuse silently, though often a result of fear or manipulation, can unintentionally enable the abuser to continue unchecked. In this case, the alleged victim’s silence meant that her husband’s abusive behavior could extend beyond their home and into the lives of parishioners. This raises the question of accountability: was there an opportunity to seek help or intervention that could have prevented harm to others?

Finally, transparency and accountability are essential in the Church, especially regarding those in positions of power. While it’s vital to approach such situations with compassion for the abused, it is also necessary to advocate for the protection of the broader community. Failing to address abuse—whether through silence, fear, or systemic inaction—can lead to widespread harm and erode trust in the Church’s leadership.

This situation underscores the importance of creating safe avenues for victims to report abuse and ensuring that leaders are held accountable. Abuse, whether in the home or in ministry, must never be tolerated, and the Church must prioritize protecting the vulnerable and ensuring that its leaders embody the virtues they are called to uphold.

Carole Stephens Comment

 


"The fact remains that Elizabeth and Matthew harassed my daughter at college to keep them safe once I found out about the assault and began my own investigation to pinpoint where to make my police report before the statute of limitations expired. This was twelve years ago. Elizabeth herself sent my daughter home crying and told her that no one should ever find out about this attack. Bipolar disorders are real, I guess, but also an excuse for bad behavior. Does that give a person license to shoot up a restaurant or a movie theater? Position is what she wanted to protect at great cost to my family. Had I found out after the event and still within my parental rights I would have prosecuted. It sounds like she didn’t protect her own children for the sake of position. What are you defending ? I knew them as newlyweds and five years before the assault on my child. Betrayal at its worst!"

Monday, January 20, 2025

Saturday, January 18, 2025

Source: "Fr. Matthew Is Severely Bipolar"

From a verified source close to the situation:

Fr. Matthew is severely bipolar, diagnosed and medicated in 2004. He went off those medications in 2022, beginning a downward spiral at that time.

The present situation is caused by victims having flashbacks and remembering childhood events, not recent actions.

These accusations were known to the Metropolitan in Mid-September, by Fr. Matthew's own confession (The family of course made their own reports, and were thorough). Action was not taken until the first week of December despite much pressure from the family.

The family is in contact with local authorities regarding criminal charges. It is a long process requiring care and discretion. I obviously cannot say more.

The attitude of the hierarchy is that this should be quiet. It was represented to the family that it is their duty to forgive and forget. This is not an option.

A whole lot of people are making huge assumptions on limited information. I understand why they're doing this, but I have seen plenty of plain lies being thrown around. Hopefully this provides useful context.

None of the family are protecting Fr. Matthew. Any indication to the contrary is ridiculous.

I want to add that Matushka [Elizibeth Williams] was investigated for neglect, and was commended on her handling of Fr. Matthew by CPS. Their words: "You did it exactly right".

Friday, January 17, 2025

Biblical Unitarians: Who and What Are They?

Bill Schlegel lived for 30 plus years in Israel teaching Hebrew and Biblical Geography. It is not easy to dismiss him when he shares the plain meaning of the scripture. 

Thursday, January 16, 2025

Father Matthew Williams Has "Formerly Resigned"

Father Matthew Williams has reportedly been allowed to resign his rectorship. His family, from which he is reportedly estranged, has been ordered not to attend either of the parishes formerly under his charge.

Even though ROCOR has taken some action in the matter of the alleged sexual crimes and misconduct of one of their priests, they seemingly did so via the current mounting pressure from numerous accusers. One might wonder however, why ROCOR allowed this suspended priest to resign rather than make an ecclesiastical decision to remove him. So, it was his choice? Is ROCOR about to do the RC thing and heal him, restore him, and send him back into a parish as a changed man?

This begs the question: What must a priest do and how many victims must come forward for you to determine that a ROCOR shepherd is a wolf?

In recent communications from ROCOR representatives the word "healing' is often used in regard to the victims of the recent event. (Although they are still deathly silent on the former matter of the alleged rape of the Stephens girl) ROCOR might garner more trust from its parishioners if they were to have said, "Father Matthew Williams has been removed from his rectorship."  ROCOR will only garner the trust of the victims, many of whom hold them accountable for their decade-long lack of action, if they finally say, "Father Matthew Williams has been defrocked and is no longer a ROCOR priest."

The JTO blog is a small media outlet but within the last few weeks has had over 14,000 views from over 40 countries/territories. Other outlets are now picking up the story such as Orthodox Christian Sexual Abuse Facebook Page. The JTO series Rape and the Holy Man was also recently linked on Donald Trump's Truth Social.

ROCOR, the world is watching, but more importantly, our Father Yahweh and his son and our messiah, Yeshua, the head of the church- your head- is watching.

ROCOR, in case you have forgotten, in case you lean more heavily on your tradition or policy in these matters, please remember that the Holy Scripture is the foundation of every tenant of faith and Saint Paul said, "I am writing so that you know how a person must conduct themselves in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth."

ROCOR, you don't have to guess! Once your "court" determines the validity of the accusations toward ANY clergy, Bishops included, this is the only template for action:

1 Cor. 5

"It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that is intolerable even among pagans: A man has his father’s wife. And you are proud! Shouldn’t you rather have been stricken with grief and have removed from your fellowship the man who did this?

Although I am absent from you in body, I am present with you in spirit, and I have already pronounced judgment on the one who did this, just as if I were present. When you are assembled in the name of our Lord Jesus and I am with you in spirit, along with the power of the Lord Jesus,
hand this man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved on the Day of the Lord.
Your boasting is not good. Do you not know that a little leaven works through the whole batch of dough? Get rid of the old leaven, that you may be a new unleavened batch, as you really are. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. Therefore let us keep the feast, not with the old bread, leavened with malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and of truth.
I wrote you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people.
I was not including the sexually immoral of this world, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters. In that case you would have to leave this world.
But now I am writing you not to associate with anyone who claims to be a brother but is sexually immoral
or greedy, an idolater or a verbal abuser, a drunkard or a swindler. With such a man do not even eat. What business of mine is it to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? God will judge those outside. 
Expel the wicked man from among you.”

Monday, January 13, 2025

"They Look Like Men"


 Full Article Here

"He said that at Protestant churches, the majority of the leaders “aren’t good, strong men”, whereas the Orthodox church leaders are more like “father figures”. He said: “They look like men. They look like fathers, they’re strong, spiritually, mentally, physically... I think young men right now are yearning to follow a good father.”

With the exception of ROCOR which knowingly ordains pedophiles and sexual abusers, and which has a Sexual Abuse Policy that favors the protection of the clergy rather than the victims? 

Father Seraphim, will you enlist some of those masculine men to encourage ROCOR to change their policy and to advocate for the protection of the clergy abuse victims? Apparently, some of their clergy have been allowed for years to be less than masculine fathers and anything but strong, spiritually, mentally and physically whole. ROCOR has a history of ignoring the petitions of the weak and fatherless and those who would advocate for them. Perhaps the ROCOR Hierarchy will listen to men with muscles?

Friday, January 10, 2025

Stand When Others Won't

My first B.A. degree was earned at a Baptist University. We were required to attend a chapel service which occurred once a week.

One such chapel service was honoring the ROTC program and its students. Several faculty and others were seated on the stage, and I was sitting toward the middle of the packed auditorium on the aisle seat.

At one point in the short one-hour service, the ROTC Color Guard, carrying the United States flag, began to process down the middle aisle. I immediately stood to my feet, as is the custom, out of respect and honor of our nation's emblem. A girl sitting next to me stood up when I did. I was surprised when no one else in the auditorium stood and thought that surely, at any second, a member of the faculty would issue the instruction for others to stand. The moment passed and no one did.

So, this left me and my cohort in an unintended act of patriotic rebellion, the only ones standing in a crowd of about 1000 during what seemed to be the longest ROTC Color Guard procession in history. Once the Color Guard stopped, my female friend, whom I had not previously met, joined me in sitting back down in our seats.

For a brief moment, I wondered if I had erred somehow. Should I have sat back down when I saw others weren't standing? I certainly didn't intend to make a statement but was doing what was the right thing to do. I quickly concluded that it was the 1000 students and our faculty who had erred. After the service, one of the faculty made a b-line for me and said, "Thanks for standing. We should have. We missed it there."

The righteous man does good even when no one is watching and sometimes when they are. Are you willing to Stand When Others Won't?

"So whoever knows the right thing to do 

and fails to do it, for him it is sin."


Freedom in Caring for Others

Brothers and sisters, if a person gets entrapped in some transgression, you who are spiritual restore such a one in a spirit of meekness, watching out for yourself so that you also will not be tempted. Carry one another’s burdens, and in this way fulfill the law of Christ. For if anyone thinks he is something when he is nothing, he is deceiving himself. But let each person examine his own work and then he will have reason for boasting in himself alone and not in another. For each person will have to carry his own load. The one who is being instructed in the word should share fully with the one who is instructing him in all good things. Do not be deceived: God is not mocked; for whatever a person sows, that will he also reap. For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption, but the one who sows to the spirit will from the spirit reap life in the age to come. Now let us not grow weary in doing what is good, for in due season we will reap if we do not give up. So then, while we have the opportunity, let us do good to all people, but especially to those who are of the household of the faith. Galatians 6: 1-10

Thursday, January 09, 2025

Appeal To His Eminence NICHOLAS

 

His Eminence NICHOLAS

Metropolitan of Eastern America & New York,

First Hierarch of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia



Your Eminence,

Your people are hurting. It is partly due to the spiritual failures of your predecessor who ordained sexual predators even with much evidence of the nature of their character. It is also partially due to ROCOR's existing Sexual Abuse Policy that leans heavily toward protecting the clergy rather than the victims of sexual abuse in your churches. Rebuke, rewrite and retrain. This systemically flawed design in dealing with sexual predators in your ranks has trickled down to the clergy on every level. Those who would report the perpetrators of sexual abuse are met with obfuscation, intimidated and threats. Surely this is not what you want. Surely you can be the Shepherd who puts in place biblical principles regarding this leaven in the body of Christ and truly protect your sheep.

Your people are hurting. Lives are being destroyed, and souls are being lost under your watch. What will you now do? I appeal to you to take this matter out of the hands of those to whom it has previously been delegated and personally direct ROCOR toward true holiness.

I appeal to you to publicly confess the failures of ROCOR (regardless of what your attorneys or advisors may tell you). Be transparent/public in announcing a plan to correct this failure. To do otherwise at this juncture will assure that ROCOR continues its rapid trajectory toward civil humiliation and accountability.


Respectfully,
Nathan Lee Lewis
JTO Editor

NOTE: Public letters, such as the one posted here, have a better chance of bypassing the gatekeepers that are in place in such religious institutions. Those who have been personally affected by past or recent sexual abuse events in ROCOR may consider contacting:

Eastern American Diocese
140 E Ridgewood Avenue
Ste 415, S Tower
Paramus, NJ 07652
Diocesan Telephone: 201-940-7340

It is recommended that a second contact be made if there is no response, then a third, then a fourth...if need be.

"And he spoke a parable to them about the necessity for them always to pray, and not become discouraged. He said, “In a certain city there was a certain judge who did not fear God and showed no regard for people. And there was a widow in that city who kept coming to him, saying, ‘Give me justice against my opponent.’ And he would not for a while, but afterward he said to himself, ‘Though I do not fear God nor regard people, yet because this widow keeps bothering me, I will give her justice, lest she wear me out by her continual coming.’” And the Lord said, “Listen to what the unrighteous judge says. And will not God give justice to his chosen ones, who cry to him day and night? Will he delay long in helping them? I say to you, that he will give justice to them speedily. Nevertheless, when the Son of Man comes, will he find trust on the earth?”

Wednesday, January 08, 2025

Hey ROCOR, Do You Concur?

By: Andreozzi & Foote
March 15, 2022


Sexual Violence in Religious Institutions

In recent years, several high-profile investigations have uncovered a scale of sexual abuse in religious institutions that most Americans struggle to comprehend.

It is estimated that in the Catholic Church alone, tens of thousands of children worldwide may be affected.

Sexual abuse is one of the most serious violations of any person’s rights – let alone a child’s rights.

It is rightly condemned in all quarters of society but when it happens in religious institutions in which we place our trust and faith, it seems all the more horrific.

As further reports come to light, the main questions that need answering center on how to tackle sexual violence in religious organizations, hold the perpetrators accountable for their actions, and provide justice and support to the victims?

Child Sexual Violence In The Catholic Church And Beyond

Child sexual violence is not just wrong. It is a human rights violation that sickens most right-minded Americans and may even be a violation of the UN’s Convention Against Torture.

That abuse has affected many children within the Catholic Church around the world is now widely accepted – but the abuse stretches far beyond the jurisdiction of The Vatican.

The Church is an institution that parents, children, and people in all walks of life have historically placed a huge amount of trust in – and many still do.

In recent years, the institution has been pressured into releasing more details about sexual abuse against children by Catholic clergy but, in many cases, it has been less than transparent.

In the worst cases, rape and other forms of sexual violence against children have been uncovered.

Children have a right to bodily integrity, freedom from violence and sexual exploitation. The actions of employees and leaders in the Catholic Church violate children’s rights on many levels and this needs to be treated as a criminal act.

Victims frequently carry their experiences into their adult years and suffer psychological and behavioral problems as a result. Obtaining justice can bring a small measure of comfort.

Unfortunately, more information has come to light about the extent of the cover-ups and denials of justice for victims, serving to make the problem even worse.

The well-documented problems within the Catholic Church have also led to a light being cast upon other religious organizations in America and around the world.

This light is only getting brighter and has implicated institutions like Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Mormon Church, Jewish Synagogues, and others in child sexual abuse claims.

The Cover-up Of Abuse In Religious Institutions

The extent of the abuse problem within respected organizations in our society has surprised many.

Cases of sexual violence are not merely isolated incidents. A culture of impunity has helped the problem grow in religious institutions everywhere.

Perpetrators have been permitted to continue with their despicable acts due to a lack of accountability and transparency, entrenched power structures that do everything possible to protect the “status quo”, and a propensity to simply “sweep the problem under the carpet” rather than addressing it.

It is unfathomable for most Americans that, in many cases, the leaders of the institution in question were aware of a problem existing but did not act to stop it or simply “relocated” the problem elsewhere.

In many cases, the institution itself (including prominent and powerful leaders at the time) knowingly harbored perpetrators of sexual violence against children or covered up what they knew.

The Urgent Need For Accountability, Justice And Reform In Religious Institutions

There has never been a greater need for more transparency and accountability within organizations that are meant to present our values as a society.

Our children’s right to protection from violence must be upheld at all costs.

This starts with holding perpetrators accountable for their actions, bringing justice to victims, compensating them for their losses, and then reforming institutions to reduce the chances of the same mistakes being made in the future.

Religious institutions – and all organizations that we entrust our children to (including educational and sporting institutions) – must be scrutinized more closely to prevent the types of cover-ups we have seen in the past.

All religious institutions are against violence and should be prepared to change in order to practice what they preach rather than maintain outdated policies that have not worked to protect children in the past.

The Catholic Church recognizes that the UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child is “the most important among the rules of international law”.

Yet, the Church and many other religious organizations have shown a historic failure to deal effectively with people who repeatedly violate the basic rights of children.

If the Church is serious about its human rights obligations, it must hold itself to the tenets of the convention – and other religious organizations must also commit to them. It should start by choosing full disclosure of information over the self-preservation strategies that it has chosen in the past.

The more that victims come forward and seek justice, the more pressure will be put on religious institutions to introduce policies that affect real change – rather than just paying “lip service” to the idea of change.

The lawyers at Andreozzi & Foote are committed to helping victims of sexual violence and child abuse hold their institutions to account.

Rest assured that if you contact us, all the information provided will be treated confidentially, including your identity.

Start with a free and confidential consultation with one of our sexual abuse attorneys.

Agency in the Bible: The Human Person Jesus "was" The Father


William (Bill) Schlegel taught Bible history, geography and Hebrew in Israel for over three decades. He is the author of The Satellite Bible Atlas, making the scripture relevant to the geographical locations of the Holy Land. Bill moved to Tennessee, USA after he came to the Biblical Unitarian understanding of the scripture. He currently is the Hebrew translation scholar for the on-going REV Bible translation, as well as a speaker and podcaster.

The audio podcast below is from the Bill Schlegel - YouTube. Bill shares a rarely discussed topic of the role of the Messiah Yeshua as the agent of his father, Yahweh. Bill suggests that a failure to understand the principle of agency has led many, especially Trinitarians, to wrongly misinterpret some scriptures to say that Yeshua/Jesus was God the Son, rather than the Son of God.

Monday, January 06, 2025

Did God Wear Diapers?


...and, no, you can't say "it is just Jesus' human nature talking", because your own Council of Chalcedon established that Jesus' two (proposed) natures could not be divided.

"...be acknowledged in two natures, inconfusedly, unchangeably, indivisibly, inseparably; the distinction of natures being by no means taken away by the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved, and concurring in one Person and one Subsistence, not parted or divided into two persons, but one and the same Son, and only begotten, God the Word, the Lord Jesus Christ."

Friday, January 03, 2025

Rape and the Holy Man - Part Five - Too Much Liberty?

I recently received comments on JTO that were derogatory and demeaning character assassination attempts directed toward Carole Stephens, the mother in Rape and the Holy Man (see Parts One through Four). I refused to post them; I did post a JTO Editor comment encouraging the commenter not to use ad hominems. The anonymous commenter then turned his/her ad hominems on me, suggesting that I was a biased and poor journalist and a coward for refusing to post comments with which I didn't agree. When that verbal cudgel and manipulation didn't work, the commenter left it with "your gay LOL", and "I know this story firsthand, you do not."

The argument from authority that this commenter presents, is a logical fallacy. A journalist, investigator, interrogator, or Blog Editor, and the like, certainly do not have to have "been there" to find the facts and come to reliable conclusions. I do not present the matters of the current issue of sexual impropriety of Matthew Williams or the utter failure of ROCOR to advocate for the innocent, from a platform of authority. 

I approach my JTO posts on all matters from the perspective of 


I believe I present a balance and understanding of the difference between the five while always preferring to provide factual documentation when it is available as it is the most powerful ingredient of any argument.

That being said, the platform from which I speak about this current issue, was initiated from my "firsthand" experience which may not account for much in the eyes of some but should at least give the reader some perspective.

Here is my firsthand account and the platform from which I speak regarding Father Matthew Williams and ROCOR:

My wife and I served with Father Gregory Williams (Matthew's Williams' father). The church, Holy Annunciation, is in Liberty, TN. My wife, who worked with and was mentored by the Arkansas Chef of the Year, organized and planned the Sunday meals. We both acted as chanters for every service, often being joined by two of our five daughters. I eventually assisted Father Gregory at the altar. We also gave financially and regularly.

Although I was willing and made the offer, Father Gregory refused to allow me to assist him in his publishing house, St John of Kronstadt Press. He also refused my offer to travel with him and assist him on his Haiti mission trips.  His refusals seemed odd and cryptic, especially since he certainly needed the help with both.  After being there a while, I became aware of his practice of nude baptisms (both male and female) and his practice of kissing female parishioners on the lips in public. I was surprised at his wife's candor one day when she told me, "He loves women." He would go on periodic "walking trips", as his wife called them, to an undisclosed destination.

We left the church as Father Gregory became increasingly controlling, demanding and manipulative of our time, even when my wife was recovering from injuries from a fall. His attempt to sell us one of his houses was a red flag. Another parishioner had already bought a house from him, which the church still used as its own. Carole (mother), of Rape and the Holy Man also lived in one of Father Gregory's houses and made payments for years toward purchasing it, only to have it, according to her, snatched out from under her by Father Gregory. When we left, we were contacted by a parishioner who said we were just another few in the long line of good folks Father Gregory had "run off."

Father Gregory had many children. A man cannot be held responsible for all of the conduct of his various children, but there was much talk of sexual impropriety, partying and ruckus conduct by the boys. One of the sons, Matthew's brother, had been arrested for drug related crimes and reportedly admitted to his sexual escapades with female parishioners. When I walked the property, I discovered piles of discarded beer cans and bottles behind an abandoned barn on the property and other evidence of it being the local meeting place for wanton conduct and drunkenness. Another abandoned house was strewn with furniture, clothes, boxes of books and other household goods and a mattress or two on the floor.

I also investigated a couple of cabins on the property. Apparently, they had housed former parishioners and also were used by at least one of Father Gregory's sons. The cabin contained old furniture, various trash and numerous photos scattered about on the floor and table. The photos were of the son and "friends" partying, wrestling half-clad. Along with the beer cans, the houses, the drug-related crimes and the photos, it was obvious to me the nature of the environment in which the Williams children, including Matthew, were raised on that large piece of mountainous property. The less-than-wholesome environment was confirmed by Carole Stephen's experience as expressed in a letter she sent to Father Gregory.

Carole Stephens, our fellow Holy Annunciation parishioner, sent this letter to Father Gregory Williams, after later discovering that the then deacon Matthew Williams had allegedly sexually abused her 15-year-old daughter: Excerpt:

"I will need to speak to you.. and it should be with some representation. It is grossly unfair how I have been used and played by not only my husband, but also what was supposed to be my church. I thought of the church as being a refuge for many years. Had I known about the abuse behind the scenes of my precious daughter, I would have not invested so many years of dedicated suffering and hard-earned money. Nothing is worth the price of supplying cheap little whores for sons who are unseemly. I can only say that at least John was upfront about his misdeed, with his wild parties and proclamations of not loving his wife as he solicited the teenage and young women of the parish... he was easy to avoid. But my [daughter]? As a silent victim? I am in a vice and being held very accountable by the Stephens for this unspeakable crime against a once pious promising [school omitted] student, whose spiritual life was sabotaged by none other than God parents of my family. And when I was trying so hard to have a win."

It was in this environment that Carol Stephens lived with her many children, sons and daughters. Her house was not on Holy Annunciation's 400-acre plot of property but was close enough for the family to walk. Her children basically grew up there, being homeschooled and attending services. The dispute over the sale of Father Gregory's house to Carole occurred after Carole's husband became estranged from the family, leaving her the sole provider. The house was in desperate shape with holes in the floor and leaks here and there. I drove Carole home one day but could not drive all the way up to the house because a deep hole in the dirt driveway made it impassable.

At some point, Matthew and Elizabeth Williams became Godparents to some of Carole's children. One of the daughters at age 15 would later babysit for her Godparents and on one such overnight job would allegedly be raped by Matthew Williams. "I knew I shouldn't have left him alone with her", Elizabeth would allegedly tell Carole later.

I recall one of the after-service meals where Carole arrived late, but Father Gregory would not allow her to eat or stay. I was told the reason for this rejection was because she had missed services. I remember feeling that that decision was quite cruel and a punishment of sorts. Carole says the reason for the rejection was because she had recently brought up the accusation of Matthew Williams' sexual assault to her priest, Father Gregory Williams.

...And the persecution and effort to silence Carole began. Father Gregory sent a letter to Carole in answer to the appeal letter sent out to him and others. It included:

"The incident to which you refer (of which neither Matushka Anastasia nor I knew anything till about a year and a half ago) occurred many years ago. The son in question (also unidentified) was an adult, living away from home. The partner/victim was a minor, but has never contacted us in any way; all we "know" even now is exceedingly vague and mostly 3rd or 4th party hearsay... I can only assume that your purpose in broadcasting this letter (I can only identify about 2/3 of the recipients, most of whom have nothing whatever to do with these issues) is to inflict harm on our family and the Church community..."

After Father Gregory Williams was found dead in an outdoor hot tub on the Holy Annunciation property, his son in law, Father Christopher Stanton, moved to the property with his wife, Matthew's Williams' sister, to become priest of the parish. From there, Father Christopher issued a letter to Carole which included the warning not to "slander" Matthew Williams, thus continuing their family's effort to diminish her.

The persecution of Carole Stephens continues to this day by various clergy, in particular the clergy of ROCOR... and, of course, attackers like our "your gay LOL" anonymous commenter. 

"But no one is able to subdue the human tongue. It is a restless evil full of deadly poison. With it we bless the Lord and Father, and with it we curse people, who have been made according to the likeness of God. Out of the same mouth comes blessing and cursing. My brothers and sisters, these things should not be this way." James 3: 8-10

Also See:

Rape and the Holy Man - The Alleged Sexual Crime of a ROCOR Priest

Rape and the Holy Man - Part Two - Appeal of a Mother

Rape and the Holy Man Part Three - All Are Punished!

Rape and the Holy Man Part Four - Sincerely, Carole Anne Stephens


Thursday, January 02, 2025

Happy New Year - ROCOR Style

Proverbs 31:8-9

“Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves; ensure justice for those being crushed. Yes, speak up for the poor and helpless, and see that they get justice.”




ROCOR, You cannot now expect to be given "time" to deal with the issue of sexual predators in your midst. You cannot now play the victim. "Oh, the evil one is accusing the church!" No. It is you- "Thou art the man", the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia, who has facilitated the evils to abound in your midst. It is the righteous who are accusing the church. 

You knew. You have known for years. Father Anastasy P. Yatrelis allegedly knew within hours of the alleged sexual assault of the 15-year-old Stephens girl. How did he allegedly know? Well, contrary to the circle-the-wagons ROCOR narrative, she REPORTED IT. SHE CAME FORWARD. (Please forgive all-caps shouting, but you don't seem to be hearing very well.) She phoned Yatrelis. She had a conversation with Yatrelis. Did any of your ROCOR investigators ask Yatrelis about that conversation prior to the late Metropolitan Hilarion's statement that the investigation "was curtailed due to lack of accusation on the part of the alleged victim" ?


Father Anastasy P. Yatrelis

Did anyone in the ROCOR Hierarchy or anyone who was empowered to deal with such matters, respond personally to the mother, Carole Stephens, all those years ago? No. How about now? In light of the current circumstances and new accusations, have you contacted Carole Stephens? Do you intend to? She has always been willing to meet. She is willing to meet now. Are you? (journeytoorthodoxy@gmail.com)

Saturday, December 28, 2024

Does ROCOR Have A Systemic Problem?

This is a link to an article originally started in October of 2022 and just finished today 12/28/2024. In light of current events regarding St Tikhon and Father Matthew Williams, a relevant question arises:


Does ROCOR have a systemic problem 

regarding the mishandling of sexual predators?


Read: